The Truth According to Whom?
by Wes Penre,
Sunday August 30 2009 at 6:55 PM
Last updated:
Saturday, July 17, 2010 12:28:50 PM
Spiritual
researchers are often referring to themselves as "truth
seekers", emphasizing that they want to "know the truth". I have
been no exception from that rule, but now I realize that I'd
rather have to ask myself, "Which truth? The truth according to
whom?
With other words, can there be more than one "truth"? In the 3rd density---yes, it certainly can!
I think that one big mistake we are making when we are researching (whether it is spiritual research or if we are trying to look behind the scenes to find out what the Dark Brotherhood that runs the show is doing behind locked doors), is that we are tirelessly looking for ONE truth, hence we can go on looking forever without finding it.
First of all there are as many agendas as there are groups, more or less, and these agendas are all true in the sense that they exist, but they won't all play a major part in our lives -- only a few will. And my point is, not even the ones that will affect us would necessarily have to, unless we stick to them and let them affect us. However, as long as we are submissive to other people's agendas to control us instead of being in control of ourselves, the playground is pretty much fair game for anyone who is strong enough to take the lead. Hence the trouble we're in.

On a spiritual level the same thing applies. We live in a universe of "free will", something we call the 3rd dimension or density, and each one of us has the potential to create our own path to reunite with our higher selves in more advanced spiritual realms. In the end, "all roads lead to Rome", there are just different path we can take---some more cumbersome and longer, others a little shorter. No path is more right or wrong than the other - we are all just spirit, once upon a time separated from First Source (God), who try to find our way back home after experiencing a physical universe. More about this separation in a later article.
Humankind has been manipulated by religion for hundreds of thousands of years or more and stuck in their dogmas, making us quite easy to control. Then blend into the mix the conviction that a certain religion is the only correct one, making all the others false, and you have diversity, separateness and religious wars, all leading up to a society under more and more overt and covert control---the society we have today.
All religions can't be true, can they? So how do you distinguish which one is and which one isn't? True according to whom?
Not until we realize that there are no truths, only beliefs, we are truly evolving spiritually. Which belief are you following?
True knowledge can
only be achieved with ultimate spiritual evolvement---when we're
ONE with First Source, the Universal Spirit. Until then, everything is
thoughts, ideas and beliefs, and our reality is a composite of the three.
What I and others are doing when we are exposing the Global
Elite and presenting our spiritual thoughts, we are only
presenting thoughts, ideas and beliefs that are out there and
share them to explain what is happening in the mass
consciousness of mankind.
By forcing our thoughts, ideas and beliefs on others, we are breaking a universal law. We have no right to do so, because everybody's path is their own. We can certainly share our concepts with whomever is willing to listen, because the other person may learn something which enhances her/him on their path, but that's all we can do, or we are seriously inflicting on the other person's free will.
Don't we
break this law all the
time? We just have to look at ourselves and people in our
environment, and we can see it happen ever so often. That
doesn't justify it, though.
Unfortunately, there are way too many researchers and spiritual/religious teachers who fall into this category as well---big time. Some are furiously throwing out their point of view and accept no "buts" and "ifs" or "maybes", or they will furiously defend their ideas. These people are just as much enemies to mankind as are those belonging to the ruling Power Elite, whether they are aware of their misconduct or not.
We need to realize that on our level of reality there are no truths, only this threefold; "thoughts", "ideas" and "beliefs", which form a concept that becomes our "reality". So if we really want to halt a person's spiritual progression, all we need to do is to force our will or ideas on him or her. It doesn't matter how "real" these ideas seem, we're still breaking the law and will halt the progress of the other person. There is ultimately only one truth, and it is that we are all ONE, just separated part of the Universal Spirit, First Source. Wittingly or unwittingly, we are all, in our own way, working on finding our way back to Source and unite with what is our Higher Self. The means to do so varies from individual to individual, and what works for one may not work as well for another. Hence, it is imperative that we don't force our beliefs on other people.
Spiritual enlightenment on a massive scale can only take place if we allow each other to experience what we need to experience---bad and good. We all have different paths and they need to be walked and learned from. If someone wants advice or guidance, give it to them (we are all here to help), but never force your will on others. And importantly, put your ego aside and accept that not everybody will take your advice to heart or thank you for your help. Service to others and unconditional love---that's what is important, not what you get in return from those you help.
The only way to
advance spiritually is to look for answers within yourself. No
one else has the answers for you. Read or listen to what others
have to say if you like, but only take to heart what feels right
for you and discard the rest. Your path is your path, no one
else can walk it for you. Hence, the same rules go for my
website -- only keep what resonates.
This website is © Copyright Wes Penre 2009, All Rights Reserved.
With permission to re-publish and using excerpts as long as credit is given,
there is a returning link to
http://wespenre.com and no alterations are
made, or things are taken out of context.
