"The Wes Penre Papers"
The Vedic Texts The Fifth Level of Learning
[http://wespenre.com]
The Fifth Level of Learning
Paper #9: The Vedic Players and their
Counterparts in Other Ancient Textsby Wes Penre, Written on Thursday, October 9, 2014
Posted on Friday, February 6, 2015
Edited by Professor Bob Stannard
(http://wespenre.com)
Download this paper in pdf
Right-click on the icon
Many
readers have contacted me and thanked me for breaking down all
these entities mentioned in the Sumerian/Babylonian texts into
the few beings who
are actually relevant to these texts. I can understand
these readers because I felt the same relief once it was done.
Using syncretism was really the key to make this happen.
Now, when we have left
Sumer and Babylon and moved down to the Indus Valley, syncretism
is even more important in order to break all this almost endless
number of deities down into the few in question.In Vishnu Sahasranama, there are, for
example, a thousand names listed for Lord Vishnu alone![1]
Some of these are his Avatars (such as Krishna and Rama), but
most of them are just alternative names for the same deity. Most
of the other deities have hundreds of names as well. I can’t
possibly mention them all; therefore, I need to use discernment
to know when to stop.
I just want to mention to
the reader what a wealth of information that is embedded in the
Vedas and the rest of the Hindu texts and how confusing it is
for someone who wants to read and learn from these scriptures.
Fortunately, we are not too concerned about Vishnu’s thousand
names—I only need to work with the few, most important ones.
What is more significant for us, however, is to figure out, by
using syncretism, which Vedic deity corresponds with which deity
in other ancient texts; such as the Sumerian, Akkadian, and
Babylonian texts, as well as the Greek, Roman, and Egyptian
mythologies. To compare all the Hindu deity names with the other
sacred texts would be a monstrous piece of work and would take
up great volumes of space. Hence, we have to be selected with
all this and only compare the most common names that are
mentioned. However, if I explain how I came to the conclusion,
just as I did in Level IV, the readers will learn how to do it,
and if a situation would occur in the future when you are
uncertain about a particular character, you have learned how to
work with syncretism and can do it yourself.
The reader has noticed that
I have mentioned Vedic characters as we have moved on through
the papers here in Level V, and I have also explained who they
are—often in reference to the Sumerian texts (which are the
texts we’ve discussed most often in previous levels of
learning—therefore, these texts are the most natural choice when
comparing different beings’ names across the cultures). However,
these entities are only the tip of the iceberg, and sooner or
later, I would need to spend an entire paper just comparing
Vedic deities with whom they are in relation to other ancient
texts. We have now come to the point when this has become
necessary, so I will focus this paper on comparing deities.
What I have decided to do
is to list deities by the names that the reader is most familiar
with and then add Vedic names to them, after which I’ll explain
how I came to certain conclusions.
I think most readers are
familiar with the Mesopotamian and Egyptian names in general;
therefore, I will list them under these names and then add the
Vedic names to them. Once I’ve started, the reader will see what
I mean.
II. Mother Goddess—the Queen of the Stars
The Goddess is not
mentioned as much in the Vedas as, for example, Lord Vishnu,
which is not so strange when we understand that the Vedas are
based on Patriarchal views of the world and the Universe. As I
have mentioned earlier, Goddess worship has existed in the
background during all this time but has been severely suppressed
by the Patriarchal Hierarchy. Nevertheless, the Goddess is
mentioned occasionally under Her Vedic names, but more as side
notes. The following are a few examples.
ii.i Aditi
Aditi is one of the names
used in the Vedas to describe Mother Goddess as the Creatrix of
the Universe. The Sages occasionally tried to suppress that fact
and make her into a less significant goddess, but this is what
it says in the Vedic texts:
Quote #1: In the Vedas,
Aditi (Sanskrit:
अदिति "limitless")[1] is mother of the gods (devamatar)
and all twelve zodiacal spirits from whose cosmic matrix the
heavenly bodies were born. As celestial mother of every
existing form and being, the synthesis of all things, she is
associated with space (akasa) and with mystic speech (Vāc).
She may be seen as a feminized form of Brahma and associated
with the primal substance (mulaprakriti) in Vedanta. She is
mentioned nearly 80 times in the Rigveda: the verse "Daksha
sprang from Aditi and Aditi from Daksha" is seen by
Theosophists as a reference to "the eternal cyclic re-birth
of the same divine Essence"[2] and divine wisdom.[3] In
contrast, the Puranas, such as the Shiva Purana and the
Bhagavata Purana, suggest that Aditi is wife of sage Kashyap
and gave birth to the Adityas such as Indra, Surya, and also
Vamana.[2]
Here we have a typical
example of what I concluded: In the Vedas, Aditi was obviously
described as the Mother of all things and the Creatrix of the
same—She was even identified as the female Brahma. She is
mentioned as many as 80 times in the Rigveda, for example. In
the Purānas, however, she was demoted to a lesser goddess,
married to the Sage Kashyap (or Kashyapa), who is the Vedic
and Purāna name for Lord En.ki, as we shall see later on. This
is very similar to how the scribes described Ninhursag in the
Sumerian texts—just as in the Purānas, she was demoted to being
associated with Lord En.ki—in the Sumerian texts, She was
sometimes described as his sister, who helped him create
mankind. I can’t think of a more intimidating statement
regarding the Goddess. First, Her son hijacks Her Experiment and
thereafter claims that his mother (here “demoted” to his sister)
helped him with the crime. Eventually, she is even demoted to
En.ki’s consort. However, as we learned in Level IV, Ninhursag
means “The Mountain Goddess,” which was the name Prince Ninurta
gave his mother, the Queen of the Stars, after he had been
promoted to be in charge of the Living Library of Planet Earth.
Thus, the Prince’s mountain fortress was named after his mother.
Ninhursag, as well as Aditi, were therefore not En.ki’s sister
or consort, but his mother, the Orion Queen.
More distorted information
exists in the Mandala, where it says, “Aditi is said to
be the mother of the great god Indra, the mother of kings[3]
and the mother of gods.”[4]
Indra is, as revealed in Paper #4, the Vedic name for Marduk.
Aditi is again (precisely as in the Sumerian texts) falsely
referred to as En.ki’s consort. However, the Vedas, for some
reason, is again setting the records straight and even provides
details that clearly gives reference that She is the mother of
all gods and not their consorts. I am aware that incest
happened amongst the gods because their rules are not the same
as ours—they live for millions of years (some say forever), and
under such circumstances, incest to them apparently loses its
meaning. If a father, who is two million years old has sex with
his daughter, who is one and a half million years old, incest is
not an issue in their minds. Still, why would the Goddess have a
sexual relationship with—or even marry—Her son, whom She had
such serious issues with?
Quote #2: In the Vedas,
Aditi is Devmatar (mother of the celestial gods) as from and
in her cosmic matrix all the heavenly bodies were born. She
is preeminently the mother of 12 Adityas whose names include
Vivasvān, Aryamā, Pūṣā,
Tvaṣṭā, Savitā, Bhaga, Dhātā,
Vidhātā, Varuṇa, Mitra, Śatru, and
Urukrama (Vishnu was born as Urukrama … She is also is the
mother of the Vamana avatar of Vishnu. Accordingly, Vishnu
was born as the son of Aditi in the month of Shravana (fifth
month of the Hindu Calendar, also called Avani) under the
star Shravana…[5]
In this reference, it
clearly states that Vishnu—even as one of his avatars—was the
son of Aditi and not his consort. Wikipedia has it correct where
it says: “...Aditi can be defined as the cosmic creatrix, the
creativity of the all-creating.”[6]
Last, but not the least,
Her real status was not only acknowledged in the Vedas, but
actually emphasized.
Quote #3: Aditi challenges
the modern idea that the Vedic peoples were patriarchal.
Aditi was regarded as both the sky goddess, and earth
goddess, which is very rare for a prehistoric civilization.
Most prehistoric civilizations venerated a dual principle,
Sky Father and Earth Mother, which appears to be borrowed
from the concept of Prithivi and Dyaus Pita. Aditi was
attributed the status of first deity by the Vedic culture,
although she is not the only one attributed this status in
the Vedas. She is addressed, in the Rigveda as "Mighty".[7]
It does for a moment seem
like the idea of a patriarchal Vedic people were challenged with
this reference, and if this was the only reference there was, it
would be an issue, but it’s easy to see by just taking a brief
examination that the ancient Indian people were patriarchal in
nature. Unfortunately, that has not changed currently.
Albeit, the true status of
Mother Goddess is mentioned in the definition of “Goddess” in
the Vedas, this status will soon be blurred when another, much
lower deity, wanted to play the Goddess of Goddesses and stole
the title, making it hers. In Mesopotamia, this lower deity was
called Ereškigal, and in the Indus valley, she went by the name
Kali (among other names).
ii.ii. Durga, the Mountain Goddess
Next to Devi, Durga
is probably the best reference to the original Mother Goddess. I
mentioned Her in detail in Paper #6, and I did it so thoroughly
that I am just going to repeat exactly what I said there.
Ramaprasad Chanda
(1873-1942) was an Indian historian and archaeologist from
Bengal and a pioneer in his field in South Asia. He wrote the
following on the development of Durga, who is the most popular
incarnation of Devi (Mother Goddess) and one of the main forms
of the Goddess Shakti in the Hindu pantheon—from primitive
goddess to her current form:
Quote #19: ...it
is possible to distinguish two different strata – one
primitive and the other advanced. The primitive form of
Durga is the result of syncretism of a mountain-goddess
worshiped by the dwellers of the Himalaya and the Vindhyas,
a goddess worshiped by the nomadic Abhira shepherd, the
vegetation spirit conceived as a female, and a war-goddess.
As her votaries advanced in civilization the primitive
war-goddess was transformed into the personification of the
all-destroying time (Kali), the vegetation spirit into the
primordial energy (Adya Sakti) and the saviouress from
“samsara” (cycle of rebirths) , and gradually brought into
line with the Brahmanic mythology and philosophy.[8]
Now it is getting pretty
interesting. We can see how the Goddess in the beginning was
personified by the Queen of the Stars, who came down to Earth to
set up the Living Library together with Her Helpers. Chanda is
talking about a “mountain-goddess,” whom we referred to in Level
IV as Ninhursag. This is exactly what “Ninhursag” means, and it
was a title Prince Ninurta gave his mother, the Goddess, as a
title of love—“The Mountain Goddess.”
Later on, however, when
the AIF (Vishnu, Shiva, and their cohorts) came and took over,
the Goddess was transformed into “the personification of the
all-destroying time (Kali)…” In other words, a change took
place, when the Goddess was no longer the Goddess, and Her title
was taken over by Kali.
This is how far I am going
to repeat what I wrote in Paper #6. The reader already knows, I
presume, who Kali is, but we are still going to bring her up
later in this paper, and if the reader needs a reminder, he or
she will get it there.
ii.iii. Bhuvaneshvari
Wikipedia can sometimes
come in handy when a subject is well researched. When it’s not,
Wikipedia can be very misleading, to say the least. Hence, it’s
very important to be aware of this and keep in mind that it’s
written by ordinary people who (hopefully) have some knowledge
on a certain subject—be it on the subject of Michael Jackson or
the Divine Feminine. I am using Wikipedia frequently myself, but
first I have the item cross-checked, and I do my best to only
use material that is relevant to my story. This is not a thesis;
therefore, it’s not as important that I always use the most
original source in the Vedas. In fact, I chose not to do that
and instead refer to sources that people more easily can digest
and absorb—Wikipedia being one of many such sources. On
occasion, however, when I think it’s necessary, I go to the
Vedic original source and list that in the foot/endnote. I just
want to make the reader aware of the sometimes dubious
Wikipedia, and when it comes to Mother Goddess, it’s overloaded
with wrong information. I don’t think it’s always intentional,
though—the writers were duped.
For example, Wikipedia
provides a list for “benevolent” Goddesses, whom they say is the
“real” Goddess in different form, worshipped by different cults.
Although this was common at the time, the goddesses listed are
not always the one and only Goddess with capital “G.” Here is a
good example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktism#Principal_deities. We
don’t need to look more than with a passing glance to see that
this list is inaccurate. Sita and Radha, for example, are listed
as Rama’s and Krishna’s consorts, respectively, and these gods
are both Lord En.ki, who was not married to the Mother
Goddess at any time. He had many lovers and consorts, but She
was never one of them. This is a grave misunderstanding, and I
just want to point out that flaws such as these are in there, in
case you want to research any of this yourself.
Otherwise, Shaktism
was a cult that worshipped the Divine Feminine and the
Patriarchal Regime. They started out in very ancient times,
before the AIF landed on Earth, and at that time, it was not
worship, just an acknowledgment and gratitude for being alive
and happy in a Universe created by the Goddess. This changed
shortly after Lucifer and his cohorts came. These patriarchs
were devoted to worship and sacrifice (as long as they
were the ones who were worshiped), and shortly thereafter, the
followers of the Divine Feminine started doing the same,
although the original worship was directed toward the Goddess.
Albeit, the sacrifice was often much milder than within the
patriarchal movement, it was still worship. In Vedic time,
Shaktism was still quite popular, and the patriarchs weren’t
displeased because they could see that worship was part of the
picture. This proved to the Patriarchal Regime that the purity
in the relationship between the worshippers and the Goddess was
distorted and heavily reduced.
The second name used for
the real Goddess is Bhuvaneshvari. She is said to be the
“Queen of the Universe.” In fact, Bhuvaneshvari means the
Queen or the Ruler of the Universe.[9]
She is the Divine Mother and the Queen of all the
Worlds. We can hardly come any closer to the terms I have
used myself throughout these papers. I only wish I could see a
reference to Orion in regards to Her as well, but have failed to
do so. She is also known as the Lady of the Universe,
Adi Shakti or Durga. She’s the “unstoppable,” and if
She really wants to do something, it gets done.
Unfortunately, the
Patriarchal Regime had to put themselves in charge instead of
the Divine Feminine. It is said in some scriptures that Lingaraj,
or Lord Shiva, is Her consort, which of course is nothing else
but a hijack of Khan En.lil’s identity. Therefore, I need to add
that Bhuvaneshvari, in Her purest form, is the Queen of
the Stars and the Divine Feminine. She was also “The Goddess as
World Mother, or the Goddess Whose Body is the Earth/Cosmos.”[10]
The Queen of the Stars is
also Brahmin, but this is something I want to explain in
detail when we define Khan En.lil in the next main section.
ii.iv. Brahmin, Devi and Shakti
Devi is the absolute
most important name for the Goddess in the Hindu religion!
Devi is the feminine form of Deva, which is the
Sanskrit word for deity. Richard L. Thompson, in his
excellent book, Alien Identities, correctly states that
humans are the descendants of Devi. Khan En.lil is then, of
course, the counterpart of “Devi” and would be “Deva.” That’s
when we boil it down to its absolute simplest form. However,
after that, Vishnu and his demigods knocked on the door and
wanted to be part of it all and started using the terms deva and
devi on themselves, as well.
Overall, the Indian text,
Devi Bhagavatam, is not widely used, and in it is
explained that it is mainly Shakti who is the Devi (Creatrix
of All). Indeed, She is the Brahmin. It is explained
clearly in the following excerpt from the above mentioned text
(my emphasis is in italics, as usual):
Quote #4: 6-10. It is
commonly known that Brahmâ is the creator of this universe;
and the knowers of the Vedas and the Purânas say so; but
they also say that Brahmâ is born of the navel-lotus of
Visnu. Thus it appears that Brahmâ cannot create
independently. Again Visnu, from whose navel lotus
Brahmâ is born, lies in Yoga sleep on the bed of Ananta (the
thousand headed serpent) in the time of Pralaya; so how
can we call Bhagavân Visnu who rests on the thousand headed
serpent Ananta as the creator of the universe? Again the
refuge of Ananta is the water of the ocean Ekârnava; a
liquid cannot rest without a vessel; so I take refuge of
the Mother of all beings, who resides as the S’akti of all
and thus is the supporter of all; I fly for refuge unto that
Devî who was praised by Brahmâ while resting on the navel
lotus of Visnu who was lying fast asleep in Yoga nidrâ.
O Munis! meditating on that Maya Devî who creates, preserves
and destroys the universe who is known as composed of the
three gunas and who grants mukti, I now describe the whole
of the Purânas; now you all better hear.[11]
This passage defends the
Divine Feminine and states that although Brahmā, in the
patriarchal world, is the Creator of the Universe, how can that
be, when he is dependent on Shakti to be just that? Lord Vishnu,
who is here equated to Brahmā, is highly questioned, as we can
see, and the conclusion is, just as it always was, that Vishnu
is not the Creator of the Universe. I know, and the reader
knows, from having written/studied the previous Levels of
Learning, that Shakti, Mother Goddess, has been teaching Her son
Vishnu/En.ki how to become a Creator God; something he took to
heart but started using for his own selfish means. Thus, Vishnu
is not the Creator because he wasn’t the first—Shakti/Devi was.
Let’s consult Wikipedia for
a moment.
Quote #5: Shaktism regards
Devi (lit., 'the Goddess') as the Supreme Brahman itself,
the "one without a second", with all other forms of
divinity, female or male, considered to be merely her
diverse manifestations. In the details of its philosophy and
practice, Shaktism resembles Shaivism. However, Shaktas
(Sanskrit: Śākta,
शाक्त), practitioners of Shaktism, focus most or all
worship on Shakti, as the dynamic feminine aspect of the
Supreme Divine. Shiva, the masculine aspect of divinity, is
considered solely transcendent, and his worship is usually
relegated to an auxiliary role.[12]
Thus, in Shaktism, although
including worship as I’ve stated earlier, Shiva, the masculine
aspect of divinity, is considered “solely transcendent, and his
worship is usually relegated to an auxiliary role.”
Here is more from Devi
Bhagavatam:
Quote #6: 1-26. …Whether
it be Myself, or Visnu or S’ambhu, or Sâvitrî or Ramâ or Umâ,
all are under Her control; there is nothing to be doubted
here? What to speak of other high souled persons! Now I will
chant hymns to Yoga Nidrâ,[13]
under whose influence Bhagavân Hari[14]
even is lying, under deep sleep, inert like an ordinary man.
When the eternal Vâsudeva Janârdana will be dispossessed by
Her, He will no doubt fight with the Dânavas. Thus deciding,
Bhagavân Brahmâ, seated on the tubular stalk of the lotus,
began to chant hymns to Yoga Nidrâ, residing on the body of
Visnu, thus :--[15]
27-32. Brahmâ said :--
“O Devî! I have come to understand on the authority of all
the words of the Vedas, that Thou art the only One Cause of
this Universal Brahmânda. The more so when Thou hast brought
the best Purusa Visnu, endowed with discrimination above all
beings, under the control of sleep, then the above remark is
self-evident.
O Thou, the Player in
the minds of all beings! O Mother! I am extremely ignorant
of the knowledge of Thy nature; when Bhagavân Hari is
sleeping inert by Thy power, then who is there amongst Kotis
and Kotis of wise men, who can understand completely the
Pastime, Leelâ, full of Mâyâ of Thine, who art beyond the
Gunas. The Sânkhya philosophers say (that the Purusa (the
male aspect of S’akti).[16]
27-50. …O Mother! Thou,
in the beginning of the Yugas, dost manifest first the Visnu
form and givest him the pure Sattrik Sakti, free from any
obscuration and thereby madest Him preserve the Universe;
and now it is Thyself that hast kept Him thus unconscious;
therefore, it is an undoubted fact that Thou art doing
whatever Thou willest, O Bhagavatî! I am now in danger; if
it be Thy desire not to kill me, then dost break the
silence, look on me and show Thy mercy.[17]
Here, a realization is made
that Shakti, or Devi, is the real Creatrix of the Universe, and
that Vishnu is merely Her offspring—something Vishnu was never
very keen on admitting.
Wikipedia also provides a
reference that Devi and Shakti are one and the same:
Quote #7: Devī (Devanagari:
देवी) is the Sanskrit root-word of Divine, its
related masculine term is Deva. Devi is synonymous with
Shakti, the female aspect of the divine, as conceptualized
by the Shakta tradition of Hinduism… Goddess worship is an
integral part of Hinduism.
[18]
Yes, Goddess worship is
part of Hinduism, but it’s quite a stretch to call it
“integral.” However, I can see what they mean by that
statement—also when it is mentioned in the same sentence as
“worship.” Although, if we read the ancient East Indian texts,
we will soon realize that they are—almost all of them—edited by
males, who were dedicated to the Patriarchal Regime.
Wikipedia continues the
discussion about the Divine Feminine by having us visit the
Indus Valley:
Quote #8: The Indus Valley
Civilization, with its neighboring cultures of Zhob and
Kulli regions in Balochistan, have yielded data on
prehistoric religious practices on the Indian subcontinent
dating back to 3000 BC. Some scholars suggest that the Indus
Valley culture has a cult of the Great Mother or the Divine
Mother, similar to such cults in Persia (Anahita), Asia
Minor and the Mediterranean; and some have even speculated
that this may be the earliest form of Shaktism.[19]
It is certainly an early
form of Shaktism, albeit not the earliest form. However,
in this time period, and earlier, there were both worship and
non-worship cults working independently, both praising the
Divine Mother. In comparison, we can say that these older cults
were more “on target” than the later ones during the Vedic
period, for example:
Quote #9: According to the
Vedas, Shakti is claimed to be Maya or illusion that casts a
veil over Brahman, the Ultimate reality. Shakti and Brahman
are inseparable entities that lie in a single body which
reaffirms the claim that Shakti and Shiva coexist.[20]
Here is where it becomes
corrupted when it’s suggested that Shakti and Shiva coexist.
With that they mean that together they cast the veil over the
“Ultimate reality.” Suddenly, Shakti has transformed into a
much darker deity, working side by side with both Shiva and
Vishnu; supposedly, Her son and grandson, if everything were
still in order. However, for the astute reader—what does this
sound similar to? “Shakti and Shiva coexist.” That sounds very
similar to what happened after the biblical Deluge, when Marduk
and Ereškigal started working together—not only to maintain
Maya, but as consorts, they started created a new race; the
current Homo sapiens sapiens.
Another example, upon which
to elaborate, has to do with En.ki’s off-worldly Minions and is
taken from Thompson’s “Alien Identities,”
Quote #10: Umā, the wife
of Lord Shiva, is also known as Māyā Devī, or the goddess in
charge of the illusory energy. She is also the Mother
Goddess who has been worshipped all over the world by many
different names. Since Shiva is Umā’s husband, he is the
master of illusion and technology. Thus there is a natural
connection between Lord Shiva, who Śālva approached to
obtain his vimāna, and Maya Dānava, the master of
illusion who manufactured it.
It is significant that
Śālva asked for a vehicle that could not be destroyed by
Devas, Asuras, Gandharvas, Uragas, or Rākṣasas.
These are all powerful races of humanoid beings that were
openly active on the earth or in its general environs in
Śālva’s time, and so naturally he wanted to be able to
defend himself against them.
Śālva’s vehicle is
described as an iron city, and thus it must have been
metallic in appearance and quite large. As we will see in
Chapter 7, many Vedic vimānas are described as flying
cities, and one is reminded of the very large “mother-ships”
that are sometimes discussed in UFO reports. Also it is
described as the “abode of darkness,” or tamo-dhāma.
Here “darkness” refers to the mode of ignorance, or
illusion, that characterizes the material world in general
and is particularly associated in Vedic literature with
beings of negative character, such as the Asuras and Dānavas.
It refers to a lack of spiritual insight, rather than to a
lack of technical knowledge.[21]
If we read this passage
carefully, we can see that something is not right. Yes, Mother
Goddess is the Creatrix of Maya, the material reality—we know
that from Level II and IV, where I explained how the Goddess
created the physical worlds, and the Earth in particular, to
have a place where she could do her Experiment. However, Shiva/Marduk
had nothing to do with it and neither did Vishnu/En.ki. This is
even proven in the Titanomachy, “The War of the Titans,”
where it clearly states that En.ki (Poseidon, Neptune etc.) are
the “younger gods,” i.e. they came “after”—they were the
“Olympians,” while Khan En.lil and the Goddess were the Titans.
They were opposed to each other; therefore, they were not
working together. Instead, the technology which the Titans used,
was stolen by the Olympians after they had won the war. This
technology was then used negatively upon the original
inhabitants of Planet Gaia, i.e. the Earth—and ultimately, us!
The “ignorance” described
here is merely the Olympians using technology to create the
“veil of ignorance” and the darkness associated with the
illusion (Maya). For Thompson’s statement to make sense, all we
need to do is to replace Umā and Māyā Devī with Queen
Ereškigal—riddle solved, puzzle laid! It’s easy to say that
goddess worship is integral in the Vedas when the “goddess” they
are talking about is not the Creatrix. I am not coming
down on Thompson here—he has done an excellent job with his
book, in my opinion, and he is just misled on this particular
piece, as is everybody else—but there is a conspiracy against
the real Goddess and her consort, which I have exposed in these
levels of learning and which I am continuously exposing in this
last, Fifth Level of Learning. However, the more that is
revealed, the better things will be understood, and hopefully,
increasingly more people will not so easily be deceived anymore.
I have no guarantees how successful it will be—I just want to do
my part to the best of my ability.
It is interesting to
understand how these different cultures overlap. Sounds are very
important, in general, in the Universe to keep things together,
but also—each object and each living thing and living being has
its own sound signature so that everything can be recognized and
identified. Playing with words is therefore similar to playing
with sounds. Thompson mentions the negative beings, such as the
Asuras. Doesn’t “Asuras” sound quite similar to the Egyptian
name “Osiris?” Many people are still accepting things such as
that as coincidences. They are not.
III. Khan En.lil—King of Orion
As a part of the Peace
Agreement between Khan En.lil of the Arcturian Bird Tribe and
Queen Nin (the Dragon Queen) of the Orion Empire, Khan En.lil
gave his daughter in marriage to one of his stepsons—the Queen’s
son—to secure the Peace Agreement (See Level II). This daughter
of Khan En.lil, who is still alive, has many names, but in these
papers she has been presented mainly as Bau. Thus, Bau was
given away as a part of the Peace Agreement to Prince Ninurta,
Queen Nin’s youngest son. Isis is, as we found out in Level IV,
another name for Ishtar and Inanna, and Isis is the daughter of
Prince Ninurta.[22]
As explained in a previous
paper, Isis was 50% Bird Tribe and 50% Dragon Tribe. I also
explained that she is, in fact, Princess Isis, and
ultimately, because of her heritage, she is next in line to the
Throne of Orion. Whomever she marries, he will reign together
with her, and if she decides to live without a consort, she will
be the sole being on the Throne—the Queen of Orion will become
the only Main Administrator[23]
of Orion.
Brahmin is the Creatrix of
this and all other universes. Thus, if Brahmin is Shakti or
Devi, then the first-born creator of the Universe would be
Brahmā. Moreover, if Queen Nin is Brahmin, then Khan En.lil
would be Brahman. This proves that Lord Vishnu is neither
Brahman, nor Brahmin—instead, he is Brahma because he is
the son of Brahmin. Also, logic tells us that if Lord En.ki is
Brahma, then Lord Ninurta, his brother, is Brahma as well.
Hence, there are two Brahmas, not one.
Moreover, Brahma is known
to be Master of the Engineers.
Quote 11: A part of the
purusha lies down within the water of the universe, from the
navel lake of His body sprouts a lotus stem, and from the
lotus flower atop this stem, Brahma, the master of all
engineers in the universe, becomes manifest.[24]
Engineers are builders are
subordinate to Brahma(s). From what we’ve learned in Sumerian
texts, the builders would be the Igigi, and the engineers
would be the Watchers. If we translate this to the Vedic
texts, the Asuras would be the builders (the Igigi), and the
Devas would be the Watchers.[25]
In the Vedas, Lord Vishnu wants to make himself known as the
Master of the Engineers, but in reality, he shares this title
with his brother.
All these things are good
to keep in mind as we move on and compare Khan En.lil and his
and his consort’s family.
iii.i. Brahman and Viśwákarma
In Buddhism and Hinduism,
Brahman is usually the equivalent to Lord Vishnu, but sometimes
also to Lord Shiva or to Lord Krishna. In other words, one of
these deities has put himself as the Highest Being in the
Universe—not as the “firstborn” but as the Creator. The original
Physical Universe was not a trap—it was a “playground” if we
want to look at it that way (souls/Fires are playful beings when
they are free), and none of the AIF members has any part in the
creation of this universe. All they can do is imitate what
already was created, and they did a poor job with it, compared
to how the real Universe is created. The latter is a
playground that we could have a lot of fun with; feel a lot of
emotion in; explore; expand; interact in; leave; and come back
to…the options are endless. We can still do a few of these
things, but not in such a pure state or form as we used to. Some
say that we, in some ways, live in a dream, and I would say
that’s true.
In the manner of Khan
En.lil, the scriptures have been heavily altered in favor of
Lord Vishnu. We could see the same thing in the Sumerian texts,
where it is obvious that Lord En.ki stole the title from the
Khan when he claimed the Abzu. The same thing is done in the
Vedic texts. Because Lord Vishnu claims the Creator
title, we would, in that sense, have two Supreme Beings—one real
and one fake. Some may suggest that this would be the case even
without Lord Vishnu because Khan En.lil is Queen Nin’s consort
and hence a Supreme Being. This is not true—something we will
discuss in a moment, but first I’d like to share a good
perspective of the Infinite Creator (or Creatrix), and this
comes from the Vedas. No matter how we calculate it, Infinity
stands alone, and if we want to assign a Being to the Infinity
concept, that Being would be One, not two, three, or more.
Quote #12: …That supreme
Brahman is infinite, and this conditioned Brahman is
infinite. The infinite proceeds from infinite. If you
subtract the infinite from the infinite, the infinite
remains alone.[26]
When the Peace Contract was
signed and Khan En.lil became Queen Nin’s consort, the Universe
could by some have been seen as being transformed from having
one Supreme Being to having two. However, Khan En.lil is not
the Creator of the Universe and has nothing to do with it.
Moreover, the Orion Empire does not consider itself as a
hierarchy, and although the Queen of the Stars could be said to
be an incarnation of the Divine Feminine, She is not considering
Herself as being in a Superior position. In this kind of
incarnation—or Divine Avatar—She is a “player in this metaphoric
“playground” and doesn’t consider Herself above anybody else in
an egotistic way. This is why it’s perhaps more accurate to see
Her as an Administrator who delegates opportunities and
dreams to those who are open to it, but She also, of course, has
Divine Powers that She can use when She thinks appropriate. When
I say that She’s a player, I mean that in the sense that She is
following the universal laws, rules, and regulations just as is
expected by other players as well. Khan En.lil has the title Khan,
which is a King of sorts, but not in a definite ruling way. It’s
more a Title of Honor and Respect—at least that’s how I see it.
Lord Vishnu definitely doesn’t have such a status or title—he is
not a Khan and never will be.
I understand how this can
be confusing for many—how can someone be a King and not to rule?
Well, on Earth that is unheard of, but in Orion, the Khan title
is more to ensure that the universal laws and rules are followed
so that peace can become the prize. It’s the title of an
Overseer and not a ruler. He is in charge of the MAKH
Warriors, which by some might be seen as a military force—or at
least a police force—but these titles are hard to translate for
me into earthly definitions. They don’t really fit. The military
is well trained, but these days only for defense. There
is no police force as far as I know because crime is next to
zero within the Empire.
Let’s also take a look at
Viśwákarma and his connection to Brahman (as always, my emphasis
is in italics.)
Quote #13: Viśwákarma
(Sanskrit:
विश्वकर्मा "all-accomplishing, maker of all," "all
doer"; Tamil: (விசுவகர்மன்)
Vicuvakaruman; Thai: Witsawakam ;Telugu:
విశ్వకర్మ; Kannada:
ವಿಶ್ವಕರ್ಮ ) is the personified Omnipotence and the
abstract form of the creator God according to the Rigveda.
He is the presiding deity of all craftsmen and
architects.[1] He is believed to be the "Principal Architect
of the Universe ", and the root concept of the later
Upanishadic Brahman / Purusha.[27]
Here we can see how the
Vedas, precisely as the Mesopotamian texts, have been altered to
fit the Patriarchal Regime better. If He is said here to be the
“Deity of all craftsmen,” and the “Principal Architect of the
Universe,” we are moving into the realm of Freemasonry. This is
describing the Masonic God, which is the Architect of the
Universe, i.e. Lucifer/En.ki. In fact, we are going to discuss
Viśwákarma in Section v.iv. of this paper.
Not much “pure” information
remains in the Vedic scriptures from what I can see that
portrays Khan En.lil in His real position and as his true self.
That makes sense, however, because the Vedas are patriarchal
texts, and as such, Lord Vishnu and his son, Lord Shiva, were
fast to kick Khan En.lil out of the story and replace Him with
themselves. Thus, there is not much to say about Him.
IV. Lucifer, aka Prince Ea, En.ki, Vishnu,
and his Various Other Aliases
Now we are getting to
deities that definitely do not lack aliases, and there is a
jungle of information about them. The being with the perhaps
most information written about him in the Vedas is Lord Vishnu
and all the characters and avatars related to him. They are, in
fact, so numerous that I have to select just a few of them and
discuss only them; otherwise I’d be sitting here for a few years
putting everything together. That’s not my task.
Ironically, most people who read the Vedas—and even many
scholars—think these characters are totally separate deities.
Not so at all!
There is a reason why I
wrote Level IV before Level V; I wanted the reader to get used
to, and be familiar with, syncretism. To use the Sumerian
texts in this respect, where the characters are not
overwhelmingly many (relatively speaking), was a perfect way to
teach how syncretism works. You can take the name of one deity
and compare him or her with another deity with a different name
but with similar characteristics and analyze whether they
correspond to be one and the same. It’s both surprising and
actually encouraging to notice that all these characters could
be narrowed down to just a few beings working behind the scenes,
pretending to be many. Here, in Level V, where I’ve taken on the
mastodon job with the Veda deities, using syncretism is a
must, or we will never figure out what is going on. The good
thing is that now the reader is somewhat familiar with
syncretism and can quite easily follow what I’m doing and
understand why I am doing it.
Why, however, were Ea and
Marduk trying to hide the fact that there have only been a few
ETs in charge of the AIF, and these few ETs have run the planet
for almost 500,000 years? Isn’t this something that would have
been a good idea to “brag” about—showing off their immense
power, proving that only a few can control the huge masses?
In fact, it makes them
vulnerable. The fact that the AIF who are many and rely on only
perhaps three or four leaders make these leaders vulnerable to
the masses that they are controlling. They are immensely afraid
that we all are going to wake up and either refuse to follow the
orders or simply create a situation where the Invaders would
have to leave the planet. It is much better to pretend that
there are many “gods” in charge in a well-organized hierarchal
structure—that will overwhelm people who are trying to figure
out the truth about their past, present, and future. They want
to prove that they are strong, when in fact there is an inner
turmoil within the AIF that is always an issue. We can see the
same thing happen amongst members of Organized Crime here on
Earth—there are a few people on top, and the rest are following
orders. However, the leaders are always terrified that their
minions are going to rebel and take over (which often happens),
or that a conflicting organization will start a war against them
and that the leadership will be taken over in that capacity.
Zechariah Sitchin actually
did describe the turmoil going on within the Anunnaki
hierarchy—he wrote about how the Anunnaki constantly fought each
other, but he never failed to keep the Anunnaki on a level of
their own and portrayed humans as merely a slave race that
couldn’t do much about their position at hand, more or less. So
the Sitchin story, which is the story that the AIF apparently
wants us to believe, does present the power struggle, but the
gods are put on such a high pedestal that it feels useless to go
against them—we are at their mercy.
Hence we can see that the
AIF tackled their dilemma from many different angles, and that
is basically what is the difference between the various myths
and religious scriptures—together they are telling the truth
about the AIF (if we are able to read between the lines), but
usually we humans stick to one version of religion or
myth and believe in that, and thus look at the gods from that
angle. However, it doesn’t matter which angle because the
gods are always superior—it is only if we look at it from all
angles that we can see their weaknesses. Apparently, the
gods didn’t expect that we humans would have the intellectual
capability to do this; therefore, they were never concerned
about it. We know how they feel an almost obsessive urge to hide
the truth in plain sight, as if it turns them on, and that’s
what they have done in the scriptures they have left behind. On
the other hand, they are not at all as confident as they once
were and must, in fact, be quite nervous that the texts, by
different researchers, will reveal their real value—the truth
or, at least, as close to the truth as we might be able to come.
I can guarantee you that there are more texts hidden out
there—some are already found and are sitting in a vault, either
in the Vatican or in some super-rich family’s bank vault, while
others are still waiting to be dug up. On the other hand, if the
AIF is nervous enough about it, they may actually be digging
them up themselves as we speak so that they can make sure that
the remaining texts don’t fall into the wrong hands. That would
be unfortunate, but not unpredictable.
Let’s continue our quest by
examining En.ki as Lord Vishnu. We have already covered some of
his Avatars, such as Krishna and Rama, but there is so much
more! As I wrote, we can’t cover them all in these papers, so I
have selected out the ones who I think are the most prominent
and are used most commonly in the Indian texts.
Although I have already
mentioned Krishna and Rama, I will begin with them because they
“branch out” into deities with other names, who are just
that—other names for Krishna and Rama. Therefore, I will
mention these two briefly before we move on to deities that may
be slightly less known. Also, Vishnu is covered in a previous
paper and will not be brought up again here. We do need to keep
in mind, though, that Lord Vishnu is the highest ranking deity
in the Vedic pantheon, and all the other gods, based on the
En.ki character, are “extensions” of Lord Vishnu.
iv.i. Lord Krishna
Lord Krishna is mentioned
in Vishnu Sahasranama of the Mahabharata and the
Keshava Namas as the 57th, 550th,
and the 24th name, respectively, as Lord Vishnu.[28]
He is also often mentioned as an avatar of Lord Vishnu, but in
Vaishnavism, which is a major branch of the Hindu
religion, he is more than an avatar of Vishnu—he is portrayed as
a full manifestation of Lord Vishnu himself, and thus One
with Vishnu.[29]
This is one of the reasons why in Hinduism you can worship both
Vishnu and Krishna without contradicting yourself—they are one
and the same.
Fig. 1. Lord Krishna with his flute.
The difference between a
god who is sending down an Avatar of himself to Earth and one
who is being a full manifestation of himself is that in the
former, he is sending a “splinter” of his soul/fire to Earth,
while he still exists somewhere else—let’s say in Svargaloka,
the “God Planet.” It’s the equivalent to what we’ve been
discussing many times before: when a soul splits his Fire into
fragments and sends those fragments to different times on the
earthly timelines. The latter means that the entire soul
(which is not fragmented) is sending herself[30]
down to Earth, as in Krishna’s case.
Krishna is known as a “blue
being” (see fig. 1), something that is often referred to
in the UFO community as a particular ET race, often as
Pleiadians, and I am going to dedicate a complete paper in this
level of learning to the Pleiadians in relation to the Indus
Valley.
I am not going to tell the
entire story about Krishna’s life, albeit it is quite
fascinating. However, it’s easy to find material to read about
his life online, and we have enough material to cover here as it
is. Although Krishna may be one of the most famous and renown of
the Vedic gods, he is far from the most interesting character
when it comes to the purpose of this level of learning.
Krishna has often been
compared to the Christian Jesus character in the sense that they
both came to Earth during a time period when life down here was
chaotic and out of control. Krishna’s purpose was to reestablish
order again, although contrary to Jesus, he often did so by
instigating, or participating in, warlike activities. This may
not be considered as particularly “divine behavior;” therefore,
Krishna is also portrayed as someone with an abundance of
unconditional love. It is clearly emphasized that he treated his
female lovers impeccably, although he had an ability to
bi-locate so that he could be with several females at the same
time. The story of Krishna seems to be particularly popular
amongst women—naturally so because women can romanticize about
how their lover gives them all the attention—something many
women would like to experience in their own lives. The Krishna
story is much about romantic love stories on a level that many
women feel they want to experience but don’t know how.
Nevertheless, Krishna’s attitude toward his women and to his
friends, in general, seems to have a tendency to make up for his
otherwise brutal behavior when it came to handling political and
personal problems.
Krishna was also famous for
his pranks and for playing the flute in a very enchanting way.
This makes me think of another famous flute player, whom I have
presented in previous papers is En.ki’s alter ego—namely, Pan.
The Pan character was also made famous, as we all know, through
Walt Disney’s cartoon character, Peter Pan.
At first, Krishna is
portrayed as a peacemaker and a diplomat—particularly in the
so-called Kurukshetra War. However, even as a young man,
when assaulted, he used his soul powers, emanating from his
chakras, and killed the assaulter. In other words, the message
was—don’t mess with Krishna, the “mediator!”
The Kurukshetra War is a
“mythological” war, described in details in the epic,
Mahābhārata. It began as a dynastic succession struggle
between two groups of cousins in a kingdom called Kuru.
The struggle was about the throne (of course; what else?) The
location of the great battle was fought in today’s state of
Haryana in India.[31]
The story states that
Krishna worked as a mediator between the two groups with poor
result. The solution to the dilemma was a war, which Krishna
fought side-by-side with the Vedic hybrid hero, Arjuna, whom we
shall talk more about later on in this paper. At first, Krishna
refused to raise any weapon in the battle, but Arjuna used bows
and arrows. Then, when it came to the point of confrontation,
Arjuna also refused to use his weapon, but that made Krishna
angry, and he manipulated Arjuna to finally decide to kill. This
didn’t happen, however, until Krishna himself took weapons and
started killing.
To read about the life of
Krishna is to read about an “unstable god.” At times, he appears
to be a loving and caring person, who affects everybody in his
environment in a positive manner, while on the flip side, he is
an impatient god and a brutal killer. This is quite the picture
we have gotten of En.ki across the levels of learning, also, so
Krishna fits the mold, in addition to the obvious proof that he
and Lord Vishnu are one and the same. Also, just as En.ki did to
the Orion Council in the Babylonian texts, Krishna broke his vow
in order to win the war.[32]
Duryodhana was fighting on the opposite side of Krishna’s, and
when Duryodhana was going to meet with his mother, Gandhari,
Krishna set him up and had the character Bhima kill Duryodhana.
The Kurukshetra War
resulted in the death of one hundred sons of Gandhari, and on
the night when her son Duryodhana was murdered, Krishna visited
Gandhari to offer his condolences, although he was the one who
instigated the killing behind the scenes by reminding Bhirma to
complete the deed. Today, we would call that covert hostility
and backstabbing. Gandhari felt that Krishna certainly hadn’t
done what he could to stop the war, so she cursed him and
basically told him that he would die thirty-six years from that
day.
When thirty-six years had
passed, and Krishna sat against a tree to meditate, a hunter
named Jara accidently mistook Krishna for a deer and mortally
wounded Krishna by shooting him with an arrow. Krishna looked at
Jara and told him that in a previous life as Rama (see next
subsection), Krishna had taken his life, so this was a part of
Krishna’s karma. Hence, he told Jara that he didn’t have to
worry about any consequences of this accidental killing. In
other words, karma was fulfilled. Thus, Krishna died.
Krishna’s death noted the
end of the Hindu Dvapara Yuga, which is the third out of
four yugas. It lasted 864,000 years and was the age between
Treta Yuga and Kali Yuga; the fourth age, which
started with Krishna’s demise and is the yuga we are currently
living in.
Fig. 2. Jara about to mortally wound Krishna with an arrow.
iv.ii. Lord Rama and Hanuman
Rama is said to be the
seventh avatar of Vishnu,[33]
so already, we know that he is an incarnation of En.ki and don’t
need to prove that any further. He was also a king and a
protagonist in the Hindu epic, Ramayana, which is another
of those epics some people who have studied the Hindu scriptures
to some degree may probably have heard about. The Ramayana
narrates his supremacy (so we won’t forget that he is of godly
nature). The interesting accepted understanding is that Lord
Rama lived 1.2 million years ago(!) during the Treta Yuga,
the Hindu age that lasted 1,296,000 years and preceded Dvapara
Yuga—Krishna’s age.
There is no evidence that
we should take the length of these yugas literally, and some
readers may object because En.ki and the AIF invaded Earth
500,000 years ago; therefore, they shouldn’t have been here
about 1,000,000 years ago, which the Ramayana claims to be the
case. However, albeit the AIF invaded half a million years ago,
there are sources who tell us that the “Anunnaki” were actually
here over the span of many earth ages, which could very well be
the case. Lucifer may have visited Earth before the invasion as
well, while Prince Ninurta and his mother were here together
with the Namlú’u, although this would have been before Lucifer’s
Rebellion, which means that Lucifer was at that time not in bad
standing with Orion and could visit frequently if he wanted to.
However, I’d like for the reader to see this as a side note—I
personally don’t think that En.ki, incarnated as Rama, was here
1,2 million years ago because at that time there was peace on
Earth, and the Rebellion, as I stated, had not yet taken place.
Rama, just as his later counterpart, Krishna, was quite
warlike. Nevertheless, Rama is considered being the most
important Avatar of Vishnu, in conjunction with Krishna, and is
called The Perfect Man, Lord of Self-Control or
Lord of Virtue.[34]
Some may say that Rama was
quite “tested;” therefore, his actions were justified, but I
find it interesting how these deities are bringing war and death
to our planet wherever they appear here. The bottom line is that
they are bringing their own unresolved conflicts down here, and
we are manipulated to participate in their warlike resolutions,
which always remain unresolved with the effect of thousands of
killed human warriors or soldiers.
The story is that Rama, his
divine wife, Sita, and his human brother, Lakshmana, spent
fourteen years in exile in the forest. While living there as
nomads, Sita was kidnapped by Ravana, a Rakshasa monarch. This
resulted in a long search, and continued with a colossal war
against the Rakshasa armies. Again, we see all these slaughters
and murders. Those who may justify a war, such as that one, have
to consider the following, however—although it may be
traumatizing for somebody to have his consort kidnapped, it’s
not a sign of higher consciousness to let thousands upon
thousands of innocent people die in the process of getting her
back. In addition—and more importantly—the Rakshasas are an ET
species from another star system, so the war is between Rama and
an ET species—another war that was brought down here, with the
consequent death for many humans in the process. Nevertheless,
Rama is called the “Perfect Man” and “The Man of Virtue”—in
other words, he is someone you and I should admire and strive to
replicate in our behavior, seen from an earthly imprinted point
of view. Wikipedia says, “Rama is revered for his unending
compassion, courage and devotion to religious values and duty.”[35]
According to the same source, the Sage named Buddha
(Buddhism) is an incarnation of Rama,[36]
which in that case, makes Buddha an Avatar of En.ki as well—see
how the puzzle pieces almost automatically fall into place once
we have crossed a certain barrier in the research. It becomes
more and more effortless.
Fig. 3. Rama in exile in the forest together with his
becoming consort, Sita, and his brother, Lakshmana.
Similar to Krishna, Rama
came to Earth because he was called upon[37]—this
time by the “Earth Goddess.” There were too many wars and too
many evil kings plundering and slaughtering on Her planet (in
reality, the “Earth Goddess” would of course never call upon
En.ki to come and rescue Her planetary body). According to the
story, She wanted Brahma (Lord Vishnu) to do something about it,
so he sent an Avatar, who became Rama. Most of the Devas who
were living here on Earth at the time were afraid of Ravana, the
evil Rakshasa King. Vishnu promised to have Rama kill the king
of the Rakshasas.
Already as a young man,
Rama learned to master divine weapons given to him to help him
slay Ravana, once he became a grown man. However, long before
the final confrontation, Rama got the chance to learn how to
kill Rakshasas, as many opportunities arose, and he was always
successful with defeating them.
Fig. 4. Hanuman finds Sita in captivity.
When Sita was kidnapped by
Ravana’s men, Rama had no idea who had kidnapped her, and the
two were separated for over a year. Ravana, unsuccessfully, was
courting Sita, who was always very loyal to Rama. She knew that
he had to fight Ravana in order to free her, and when Rama’s
“right hand,” Hanuman, found her and wanted to rescue her, she
refused to come because Rama was supposed to be her rescuer, not
Hanuman.
Eventually, this story, as
most stories do, ended “happily.” Rama managed to kill Ravana
and free Sita, who then became his wife. In Viakuntha (Vishnu’s
abode), however, Sita is Lakshmi, Vishnu’s consort, who often
incarnated together with him when he sent an avatar to Earth.
This makes sense, of course, when we know that Rama and Vishnu
are one and the same.
Rama’s reign lasted for
11,000 years, and the story tells us that during this period,
there was complete peace and harmony on Earth, and people were
healthy and happy.
Rama had many companions
throughout his life, and Hanuman, the “monkey man,” was one of
them. His face looked like a mix between a monkey and a human
(see fig. 4), but his name does not really mean “monkey
man;” it stems from the Sanskrit word “Ha” which means “jaw,”
and “man” (or –mant) which means “disfigured.”[38]
He was always loyal to Rama, and he was the one who was the most
devoted to find Sita when she was kidnapped. Several texts
indicate that he was the incarnation of Shiva,[39]
which of course would make him Marduk. We are used to Marduk
being En.ki’s son, which he is, but while on Earth, father and
son every now and then were incarnated as humans and were then
not always father and son in a physical manner. Some say that
En.ki is about to incarnate in a human body again (or perhaps
already has), and there are allegedly twelve human males who
claim to be aspirants for housing En.ki’s soul. I have covered
that in previous levels of learning, and in the e-book, The
Myth Around Supriem David Rockefeller.[40]
At this point, I only know of three people who claim to be
waiting for En.ki to choose one of their bodies. The other
nine—if they exist—are unknown to me—thus far.
Hanuman was also a
shapeshifter, according to the Ramayana. It says:
Quote #14: In the
Ramayana Hanuman changes shape several times. For
example, while he searches for the kidnapped Sita in
Ravana's palaces on Lanka, he contracts himself to the size
of a cat, so that he will not be detected by the enemy.
Later on, he takes on the size of a mountain, blazing with
radiance, to show his true power to Sita.[41]
The stories of Krishna and
Rama have been rewritten many times throughout history, and the
stories I’ve just told are the perhaps the most common ones in
existence today. It was important to portray the two as saviors
of mankind and not as warriors without conscience, which they
were. They were, basically, two in a long line of “Saviors” who
have come to Earth to help humankind in times of struggle—Jesus
is just the last in line, and it’s quite possibly time for
another one soon. After all, that is what’s been promised in the
scriptures. Krishna and Rama also “helped” make war seem to be a
solution to conflicts when arguments failed, and because they
both were also portrayed with enormous compassion in other parts
of daily life, humans looked up to them as role models. These
two ETs were, of course, only two in another long line of
leaders who have been depicted as warlike but also
compassionate—something for mankind to mimic. It has certainly
worked if we look throughout history—mankind has definitely
taken after the gods, tried to be like them, and often we have
been all too eager to serve them.
iv.iii. Varuna, God of the Oceans
The reader may recall from
Level IV, in particular, how I referred to the Underworld as
being a part of the Afterlife. I also mentioned that the same
beings we now are so familiar with are in charge of that
realm—in fact, they created it. The Queen of the Underworld is
known as Ereškigal in the Sumerian texts, and her consort became
Nergal, another of En.ki’s alter egos. We are now going to
compare this information with what is primarily available in the
Vedic texts. Essentially, there are two male Devas who are
related to the Underworld, and Varuna is one of them. First, I
will establish who the Vedic Varuna character is so that we make
no mistake about it.
Quote #15: In Vedic
religion, Varuna (Sanskrit Varuṇa
वरुण, Malay: Baruna) or Waruna, is a god of the water
and of the celestial ocean, as well as a god of law of the
underwater world. A Makara is his mount. In Hindu mythology,
Varuna continued to be considered the god of all forms of
the water element, particularly the oceans.[42]
This makes Varuna the
counterpart of Ea, Poseidon, Neptune, and Oannes, foremost, as
all these deities are known to be related to water. In the above
Wikipedia quote, it also takes into account the “underwater
world,” which would be a connection to Ea’s Abzu (the term he
stole from Khan En.lil). What connects all these beings all over
the mythological spectrum, however, is that they are all gods of
“all forms of water elements, particularly the oceans.” There is
no doubt that Varuna and Ea/En.ki are one and the same.
Here is another revealing
passage from the Vedas:
Quote #16: Later art
depicts Varuna as a lunar deity, as a yellow man wearing
golden armor and holding a noose or lasso made from a snake.
He rides the sea creature Makara.[43]
Again, in Level IV, it was
revealed that En.ki equates the Sumerian moon god, Nanna (Nannar)
or Sin, as he is also called.[44]
Above is also a reference to snake, which is more En.ki
symbolism—En.ki being the “Serpent of Eden.”
Now, when we have
established who he is, here is a reference to Varuna and his
Underworld and Afterlife connection:
Quote #17: In post-Vedic
texts Varuna became the god of oceans and rivers and keeper
of the souls of the drowned. As such, Varuna is also a god
of the dead, and can grant immortality.[45]
These are En.ki
characteristics, congregated in one place. We have the oceans,
rivers, “keeper of souls,” and a “god of the dead” who can grant
immortality (referring to his scientific skills in genetic
engineering).
iv.iv. Yama, God of the Afterlife
Once more, let us start
with establishing that Yama is actually a Vedic counterpart of
En.ki.
Quote #18: His Greek
counterpart is Hades and Thanatos. His Egyptian counterpart
is Osiris.[46]
In Level IV, we discussed
both the Greek god Hades and his Egyptian counterpart, Osiris.
They both turned out to equate to En.ki. With that said, let’s
go over to death and the afterlife. This is what Richard L.
Thompson, the expert in the Vedas, has to say about Yama:
Quote #19: Vedic Lord of
Death. Those familiars of Yama are charged with the
conduction of time...The latter are functionaries equipped
with mystic powers that enable them to regulate the process
of transmigration of souls. Yama supervises the process of
transmigration.. The familiars of Yama have exert control
over their subtle bodies.[47]
This statement is telling
us many things! It even teaches us that Yama and his cohorts
exert control over our avatars.[48]
In addition, it tells us all we need to know about who Yama is
and how extremely well it corresponds with the Sumerian Nergal
character, who also was proven to be En.ki. This is a perfect
cross-reference of similarities between two different
mythologies. In addition, we have his Greek counterpart in
Hades, and we can go on and on, researching other mythologies
around the world, and I guarantee we will find the same kind of
evidence there.
iv.v. The Ādityas of the Zodiac
It’s now time to look a
little bit at the Sun gods in the Vedic texts. We’ve already
identified En.ki’s connection to the Moon in both the Vedas and
the Sumerian scriptures.
Normally, we are used to
connecting Marduk with being the Sun god—particularly in his
forms as Marduk Ra and Utu Šamaš (Shamash) in the Egyptian and
Babylonian texts, respectively. However, in the Vedic
literature, Vishnu and Shiva (En.ki and Marduk, also
respectively) are sometimes intertwined, almost as if they were
one deity, and one deity alone. As we shall see, En.ki is
ultimately connected with being the Sun god in the old Indian
texts through his connection with Ādityas. Let me explain you
what I mean:
Quote #20: In Hinduism,
Ādityas (Sanskrit:
आदित्य, pronounced [ɑːd̪it̪jɐ]),
meaning "of Aditi", refers to the offspring of Aditi. In
Hinduism, Aditya is used in the singular to mean the Sun
God, Surya. Bhagavata Purana[1] lists total 12 Adityas as
twelve Sun-gods. In each month of the year, it is a
different Aditya (Sun God) who shines. All these 12 Adityas
are the opulent expansions of Lord Vishnu in the form of
Sun-God.[49]
We learned in Section
ii.i. that Aditi is the Queen of the Stars—the Mother
Goddess. In Quote #20, it says
that Áditya is the offspring of Aditi, which means he is the son
of Aditi, the Star Queen, aka Queen Nin. We also know that Queen
Nin had at least two sons, En.ki and his younger brother Ninurta
(Prince En.lil). Ninurta is not involved in this story so that
leaves En.ki, whom we now suspect may be Áditya. Now, we are
going to prove it, but not only that—through En.ki’s incarnation
as Ádityas, we are going to learn some interesting things that
correlate with what we discussed in Level IV. The Vedas are so
rich with information that if the researcher is patient and
concise, he or she can find the correlation he or she is looking
for.
In Rigveda, Aditi has seven
sons, whom all are Asuras. They are:
I don’t want to confuse the
reader here, but the name Áditya can also be a term, Ádityas,
which means “Sun-gods.” In the Rigveda there are obviously seven
Sun-gods, whereof, Varuna (En.ki) is the one listed first.
However, in the Bhāgavata Purāna, there are twelve
Sun-gods, and that’s when it’s getting interesting.
Quote #21: In each month
of the year, it is a different Aditya (Sun-God) who shines.[1]
As Indra, Surya destroys the enemies of the gods. As Dhata,
he creates living beings. As Parjanya, he showers down rain.
As Tvashta, he lives in the trees and herbs. As Pusha, he
makes foodgrains grow. As Aryama, he is in the wind. As
Bhaga, he is in the body of all living beings. As Vivasvana,
he is in fire and helps to cook food. As Vishnu, he destroys
the enemies of the gods. As Amshumana, he is again in the
wind. As Varuna, Surya is in the waters and As Mitra, he is
in the moon and in the oceans.[53]
Here, it tells us that
Vishnu is not only one of these twelve Sun-gods, but he is also
the Head of all Ádityas! Varuna is mentioned here as
well, being one of Vishnu’s Avatars, so apparently, those
counted as well. Thus, we can’t say that Aditi had twelve sons
with any certainty because a son’s Avatar also was mentioned in
the equation. Indra, who equates to Marduk, is also mentioned
amongst the twelve, which makes sense.
The AIF, just as Mother
Goddess does, has this thing with the number 12—sometimes with
number 13 as the additional number. Universes are built around
these numbers, and thus is the zodiac. The zodiac, of course,
has everything to do with the Sun; therefore, it also has
everything to so with the Sun-gods, as we know, and that’s where
it’s getting interesting.
In Level IV, we were
discussing the 12 signs of the zodiac and how beings “jumped”
from one sign in the zodiac to another when the signs changed,
in order to be in charge of the new sign. It seems that being in
charge of a zodiac was either a competition between the gods, or
each sign of the zodiac was meant to be assigned to one god so
that they could rotate their power. Maybe the latter once was
true, but it evolved into being a competition, and it concluded
with En.ki and Marduk taking possession of all the twelve signs,
and it has been this way for eons. Some say that there is a
thirteenth sign, from which En.ki and Marduk run the other
twelve.
All this may or may not
correlate with what I have stumbled onto here with the twelve
Ádityas, but it definitely is food for thought. In
Quote #21, we can see some
backup to my earlier statement in Level IV. Also, it is
interesting how the Vedic gods can shapeshift and take on
anything they want—they can even be in the wind and decide how
the winds will blow; they can be in the fire and help to cook
food; they can be in the waters, the moon, and in the oceans,
etc. The reader may argue that these gods can do these things
through technology, and that may very well be true, because
their power as “gods” would not be as extensive if they didn’t
have their “devices” that could help them achieve certain, for
us, unobtainable goals. It’s not only the Vedas that are telling
us about the gods being one with the elements, however—it’s all
over the Sumerian texts and in the Bible. It’s also mentioned in
most other ancient scriptures. We know that these beings can
shapeshift—once we know how they do it, it’s not a big deal—but
in this case, some of it may be done with technology. As Bhaga
(see Quote #21 again), the
Sun-god is even able to be within “every living being,” which
probably means that he is merging with the Grid and the Mass
Consciousness of Planet Earth or maybe the Akashic Records.
Now, I’d like for the
reader to be very observant and read
Quote #21 one more time. I don’t know about you, but to
me it almost seems and sounds as if it’s the same Sun-god taking
on the identity of all the other eleven Sun-gods. If this is
true, it certainly backs up what I stated in Level IV, but even
if it’s not the case, it seems as if I have the backup anyway—so
it works either way. It’s not that I am particularly looking for
backup on this subject—I know that what I stated in Level IV is
true—but it is always nice for the reader to get extra
verification as well sometimes.
There is another logical
aspect for Shiva and Vishnu to change places in the Pantheon and
confuse everybody. It has to do with the takeover of Queen
Aditi’s identity at one point. I want to explain that, too, but
I think it’s more appropriate to explain this when we discuss
Queen Ereškigal’s alter egos later in this paper. The ancient
mythologies never seem to stop amazing me, though, because once
one has learned how to put these things together, the whole
story is told between the lines, and very little seems to be
left out. In other words, it gets easier and easier to find what
I’m looking for, as if I were just looking things up in an
encyclopedia, and there it is!
iv.vi. Agni—another Schizophrenic God?
Agni is another deity in
the Vedas with a “personality disorder.” He is sometimes
depicted as En.ki and sometimes as Marduk; the two taking on
each other’s attributes.
In the next paper, we will
go into more details about which god in the Vedas is associated
with which star or star system. Now, however, in order to
explain who Agni is, I will reveal that Brahma (in form of Lord
Vishnu) is the Lord of Heaven—his own version of Heaven—and this
Heaven is located in the star constellation of Taurus, the Bull,
which also is the constellation where the Pleiades are located.
Vishnu’s main Vedic abode is alpha Tauri, which has a second
name—in the Vedas it’s not called alpha Tauri but Rohini,
which means “the red one;” a name of the red giant star,
Aldebaran! Rohini is also known as brāhmī.[54]
Thus, Aldebaran is Lord Vishnu’s star! I also exposed
Aldebaran in my 2009 e-book, The Myth Around Supriem David
Rockefeller, Chapter 10,[55]
as being the star system from where the “Anunnaki” are, to a
large degree, residing.
We discussed in a previous
paper that Satyaloka is the highest and topmost loka within this
material universe, and it is located in the star system of
Aldebaran, 65 light-years from Earth.[56]
The Vril Ladies around the Nazi Germany era channeled the
Anunnaki, who were said to reside in Aldebaran, and there is a
long and interesting story around that, which was partly told in
The Myth Around Supriem David Rockefeller, but we are
going to dig into that much deeper and in much more accuracy in
a future paper. Regardless of what some people have had to say
about the “Supriem book,” it holds up and thus far tells a
marginal story, which can, if the AIF decides to, move from the
margins into a proper place in the “Book of Planet Earth—the
Real Story,” which could be said to be the papers I am now
writing.
Fig. 5. Orion is aiming at Taurus with his bow and arrow,
showing they are not the best of friends
Now we know that Lord
Vishnu, aka En.ki, is in charge of Aldebaran, but what about
Agni? In Hinduism, Krittika is an old name for the
Pleiades, where Agni, the “God of Fire” rules.[57]
Here we see that Agni is not necessarily just in charge of
Aldebaran, but also of the Pleiades in general—including the
so-called Seven Sisters. Normally we are used to relating
the God of Fire to Marduk and his counterparts because Marduk Ra
is the Sun-god, but here it seems as if the Sun-god title is
transferred to Vishnu/En.ki. For now, just hold on to this
thought while we continue.
On Crystalinks.com, the
webmaster says, “The Pleiades are called the star[s] of fire,
and their ruling deity is the Vedic god Agni, the god of the
sacred fire,”[58]
and in Wikipedia’s list of Hindu deities, Agni is “the god of
fire, and acceptor of sacrifices.”[59]
The more I look into Agni,
I have concluded that he can be both Vishnu and Shiva, depending
upon which time period, but also depending upon what is
convenient and seems appropriate at the time. Here is an
otherwise clear reference to Marduk, as the ram is mentioned,
but he is also depicted with two heads, which could be a layered
symbol, also meaning that he is two deities in one (Vishnu and
Shiva).
Quote #22: Agni, the Vedic
god of fire, has two heads, one marks immortality and the
other marks an unknown symbol of life. Agni has made the
transition into the Hindu pantheon of gods, without losing
his importance. With Varuna and Indra he is one of the
supreme gods in the Rigveda. Due to the link between heaven
and earth, and deities and humans, he is associated with
Vedic sacrifice, taking offerings to the other world in his
fire. In Hinduism, his vehicle is the ram.[60]
Also, Agni has three forms:
fire, lightning, and the Sun.[61]
All three of these attributes point toward Marduk. However, as I
stated, it is dependent upon which scripture we are looking at.
For example, in Ayurveda,[62]
he is the one responsible for the sustenance of life,[63]
which would make him Vishnu/En.ki. Also, in the Rigveda, it
states that Agni “arises from water and dwells in the waters,”[64]
which would make him En.ki/Oannes/Poseidon, and so on.
This is not the first time
we see this apparent confusion—it’s also in the Bible, where we
have the schizophrenic Jehovah/YHWH, who acts this way because
he is a composite of at least two beings—En.ki and Marduk.
Therefore, I am going to assign both En.ki and Marduk to
Agni as well.
There are a myriad of other
Hindu deities who would fit the profile of En.ki, and as
mentioned before, these six deities mentioned thus far are only
the tip of the iceberg. I chose them, although research has been
done on quite a few more of them because these six are, in my
opinion, the most important ones for the purpose of these
papers. Therefore, we will end the research on En.ki’s
counterparts here and turn our attention to his son, Lord Marduk
Ra, to see what we can find on him.
V. Marduk Ra—Lord of the Sun and the Earth
Marduk Ra is not an ounce
better than his father, En.ki, when it comes to having an
astronomic number of aliases. One really has to keep one’s mind
straight to be able to separate them all from the thousands of
names, literally, mentioned in the ancient literature. The
Vedas, and the Hindu texts in general, are certainly the richest
gold mine of information there is, in this respect, and here one
really has to be careful. Fortunately, it gets easier the more
one digs; otherwise, the job would be almost unbearably tedious.
We have already, in
previous papers, identified certain beings in the Hindu texts
that are equated to Marduk, so I’m not going to go over these
again—we have other characters we need to examine now instead.
Before we start, I will list the ones I have already
cross-checked and presented to the reader in previous papers.
Hence, I will list Hindu names for Marduk, in alphabetical
order, and in which paper I exposed them. This list I think may
be helpful for the reader.
The names below are all
Hindu names for Marduk Ra.
1.Garuda, Paper #6.
2.Hanuman, Papers #8 and #9.
3.Indra, Paper #4.
4.Ketu (Both En.ki and Marduk), Paper #6.
5.Rahu, Paper #6.
6.Rudra, Paper #7.
7.Shiva, Papers #1 and #3.
In addition, we have also
discussed (and I have provided evidence of) that the Greek god,
Apollo, is Marduk’s counterpart (see Papers #3 and #8), as well
as Horus (Paper #8).
Now, let us uncover what
else we can find out about Marduk Ra and his Vedic counterparts,
and you, the reader, if you so wish, can add those names, one by
one, to your own list, starting with the 1-7 above.
v.i. Surya—Lord of the Chakras
We already know that we are
being heavily controlled, both while we are in the flesh and in
the spirit world. Some may think that we know what we need to
know by now, and that is it! It may feel like more than enough.
Unfortunately, I need to
fill your brains some more, so please make room! There is still
much more we need to grasp about ourselves and the controllers
who keep us imprisoned. Although I am very well aware that a
considerable part of all this could be viewed as “bad news,” I
am still very happy that I started walking this path—eating from
the Tree of Knowledge, as it were. I think it does protect me,
and the knowledge leads to so[u]lutions I can work with. Without
comprehension, I would, as do so many others on this planet, try
to fly but always end up falling flat on the ground. I hope and
assume that the reader will think similarly.
In New Age, channeling, and
spiritual research, we tend to discuss chakras to a large
extent. I have mentioned them, too—especially in the earlier
levels of learning. We have seven of them that are connected
directly with our bodies, plus an additional five that are also
connected to us, but are more far reaching—stretching way out in
the galaxy and further out in the Universe. Let us understand
how our seven chakras, foremost, are related to the AIF, and to
Marduk in particular. To successfully be able to do so, we need
to begin by looking at the Hindu god, Surya. Here’s the
astrological aspect of him (my own additions are within these
kind of brackets [ ]):
Quote #23: In Vedic
astrology Surya is considered a mild malefic on account of
his hot, dry nature. Surya represents soul, will-power,
fame, the eyes, general vitality, courage, kingship, father,
highly placed persons and authority. He is exalted in the
sign Mesha [Aries], is in mulatrikona in the sign Simha
[Leo] and is in debilitation in the sign Tula [Libra].[65]
Let’s continue and learn
more:
Quote #24: Surya is the
chief of the Navagraha, the nine Indian Classical planets[66]
and important elements of Hindu astrology. He is often
depicted riding a chariot harnessed by seven horses which
might represent the seven colors of the rainbow or the seven
chakras in the body. He is also the presiding deity of
Sunday. Surya is regarded as the Supreme Deity by Saura sect
and Smartas worship him as one of the five primary forms of
God.[67]
[…]
Surya as the Sun is
worshipped at dawn by most Hindus and has many temples
dedicated to him across India.[68]
Here we see that Surya is a
Sun-god, and Sunday is actually dedicated to him. More serious
is the mentioning of him representing the seven chakras. This is
something to bear in mind because we are going to follow up on
the chakras in much more detail as we move on. As it is, we
think we are in charge of our own chakras—at least when we are
“awakening,” but I would say we are not—not until we have
awakened to the truth about the chakras as well. Can the
readers see what kind of “beginners” we all have been (and still
are), but at least we are now quickly getting use of more and
more of our brain power, and we are getting more access to our
dormant DNA. The reader might, or might not, realize this, but
by learning what is in these papers, our brain and DNA
capacities are increasing manifold.
In
Quote #25, we have the proof
that Surya indeed is Marduk, when we learn that Surya’s Egyptian
counterpart is Ra (my emphasis in italics):
Quote #25: Like some other
deities, such as Shiva, who are worshiped by saints, normal
worshipers and demons, Surya too has a following of the same
types of beings. Group of Raksasas known as Yatudhanas were
the followers of Surya and wandered with him.[6] It is also
mentioned that Bhauvana the Daitya offered a prayer to Surya
with the Rathantara saman and was immediately turned into an
elephant.[6] His Greek counterpart is Helios and his
Egyptian counterpart is Ra.[69]
Now, when we know who Surya
is, let us continue looking at the chakras and the Kundalini.
Quote #26: Surya's seven
horses also represent the seven chakras in the chakras or
spiritual centers in our subtle body, the blossoming of
which leads to the rising of the power of Kundalini or the
serpentine energy residing within us.[70]
Fig. 6. Lord Surya on the Seven Horse Chariot.
We learn that the Seven
Chakras are equated to seven horses, and the Kundalini is
“serpentine energy,” i.e. serpent being on En.ki’s nature. From
here, we have the term “horseman” or “horsemen.” To see the
link, let us turn to ancient Egypt (I know this is a long quote,
but please bear with me and read it all).
Quote #28: The Uraeus (/jʊˈriəs/;[1]
plural Uraei or Uraeuses; from the Greek οὐραῖος,
ouraīos, "on its tail"; from Egyptian jʿr.t
(iaret), "rearing cobra") is the stylized, upright form of
an Egyptian cobra (asp, serpent, or snake), used as a symbol
of sovereignty, royalty, deity, and divine authority in
ancient Egypt.
The Uraeus is a symbol
for the goddess Wadjet, who was one of the earliest Egyptian
deities and who often was depicted as a cobra. The center of
her cult was in Per-Wadjet, later called Buto by the
Greeks.[2] She became the patroness of the Nile Delta and
the protector of all of Lower Egypt. The pharaohs wore the
Uraeus as a head ornament: either with the body of Wadjet
atop the head, or as a crown encircling the head; this
indicated Wadjet's protection and reinforced the pharaoh's
claim over the land. In whatever manner that the Uraeus was
displayed upon the pharaoh's head, it was, in effect, part
of the pharaoh's crown. The pharaoh was recognized only by
wearing the Uraeus, which conveyed legitimacy to the ruler.
There is evidence for this tradition even in the Old Kingdom
during the third millennium BCE. Several goddesses
associated with or being considered aspects of Wadjet are
depicted wearing the Uraeus also.
At the time of the
unification of Egypt, the image of Nekhbet, who was
represented as a white vulture and held the same position as
the patron of Upper Egypt, joined the image of Wadjet on the
Uraeus that would encircle the crown of the pharaohs who
ruled the unified Egypt. The importance of their separate
cults kept them from becoming merged as with so many
Egyptian deities. Together, they were known as The Two
Ladies, who became the joint protectors and patrons of the
unified Egypt.
Later, the pharaohs
were seen as a manifestation of the sun god Ra, and so it
also was believed that the Uraeus protected them by spitting
fire on their enemies from the fiery eye of the goddess. In
some mythological works, the eyes of Ra are said to be uraei.
Wadjets existed long before the rise of this cult when they
originated as the eye of Wadjet as cobra and are the name of
the symbols also called the Eye of the Moon, Eye of Hathor,
the Eye of Horus, and the Eye of Ra—depending upon the dates
of the references to the symbols.
As the Uraeus was seen
as a royal symbol, Horus and Set were also depicted wearing
the symbol on their crowns. In early mythology, Horus would
have been the name given to any king as part of the many
titles taken, being identified as the son of the goddess.
According to the later mythology of Re, the first Uraeus was
said to have been created by the goddess Isis, who formed it
from the dust of the earth and the spittle of the
then-current sun deity. In this version of the mythology,
the Uraeus was the instrument with which Isis gained the
throne of Egypt for Osiris. Isis is associated with and may
be considered an aspect of Wadjet.[71]
From this long quote, we
can make a link from Uraeus to the goddess Wadjet, with links to
Marduk Ra, Hathor, and Horus. Uraeus/Wadjet have a link to the
Sun-god Surya via the Kundalini and the “Spirit Horses,” the
chakras. Thus, Spirit Horses have a link to Surya. In Egyptian
mythology, we see a similar motif with Ra, who is sometimes
referred to as Horus (Sun-god). Hence, we can see that these
Horses are controlled by the Sun-god Ra and his Hindu
counterpart Surya, and in some respect, also Horus.
Thus, the Seven Horsemen
(who are mentioned in the Bible) equal the seven chakras, and
the eighth that controls the seven is the Sun-god, if we take
the symbology about the Horsemen into consideration.
Quote #29: Maha Shivratri…is
the celebration of the Hindu God, Shiva. On this day,
devotees fast, practice meditation and yoga in reverence of
Shiva. Shiva means, “auspicious one” and he is usually
depicted in meditation with a third eye at the brow,
crescent moon, snake coiled around his neck, while holding a
trident and a drum.[72]
Thus, Shiva, who is another
aspect of Surya and Ra, can be associated to one of the chakras
(Horsemen), namely the sixth, which is the Third Eye. This is a
beginning to explain to the reader that the Seven Horsemen are
the symbols for the seven chakras, and when we open the chakras
in all our ignorance, who is in control of the energy that is
exchanged during a meditation, for example? If someone is “in
control” of something, and someone else isn’t, and is even
ignorant that someone is in control at all, it means that the
one in control can use his power however he wants to. More
important; the energy that suddenly is available when someone is
opening his or her chakras can be harvested by the one in
control.
We may also want to ask
ourselves: who is in control of the “spiritual movement?” Even
if many want to distance themselves from New Age, are they
really? Just because we say we are in control doesn’t
necessarily mean we are. There is no doubt that man is evolving,
but evolving into what, under whose hidden control, and under
which conditions? Does the AIF let us evolve because they want
us to, and if so, why? This might be something to think about
very hard. More about this later, of course.
v.ii. Ganesha, the Elephant Man
Although many people have
never heard his name, I think Ganesha is still a well-known
Hindu god amongst people. The reason for this is that he is the
“Elephant Man”—he has a human torso but an elephant head with
trunk and everything. This is a common picture (see fig. 7
below) that we often see in relation to the Hindu religion.
My purpose with exposing
all these gods and comparing them is not only to prove that the
gods are the same all over the world—I think I have already
proven that—but for each god I am exposing, I want the reader to
learn something new about the Alien Invader Force (AIF). This
is also true with Ganesha. First, however, I want to do a small
presentation of the god.
Fig. 7. Ganesha, the “Elephant Man,” depicted
with his four arms and elephant head.
Ganesha is still a widely
worshipped deity in the Hindu pantheon. He is known as the
remover of obstacles, the patron of arts and sciences, and the
Deva of intellect and wisdom.[73]
He is also the god of beginnings and is honored before starting
ceremonies and rituals.
Here is an interesting
thing; Ganesha is also invoked as patron of letters and learning
during writing sessions.[74]
If he is Marduk (which I intend to provide evidence of), this
statement is remarkable because Marduk was the one who often
dictated what came to be written into the scriptures, while the
Sages were the ones who actually wrote it down. It’s like
someone would say that Josef Mengele was the master scientist
when it came to twins, and then stop there. Those who have done
their research know that Mengele mapped the human brain using
what he learned from identical twins (usually through torture
and sexual abuse)—research that later became known as MK ULTRA
and Monarch Mind Control. I believe the statement that Ganesha
was the patron of letters and learning during writing sessions
because that statement definitely hints at him dictating what
was to be written into the historic records. Some may think it’s
harsh to compare that with Josef Mengele, but the effects were
quite similar, as were the intentions.
Now, let us discover what
the Ganesha’s name means.
Quote #30: The name
Ganesha is a Sanskrit compound, joining the words gana
(Sanskrit:
गण; IAST: gaṇa),
meaning a group, multitude, or categorical system and isha
(Sanskrit:
ईश; IAST: īśa), meaning lord or master.[15] The word
gaņa when associated with Ganesha is often taken to refer to
the gaņas, a troop of semi-divine beings that form part of
the retinue of Shiva (IAST: Śiva).[75]
We are obviously back to
Lord Shiva again, and we know that Lord Shiva is the equivalent
with another Lord—Marduk. If we continue on this trail, some
commentators interpret the name “Lord of the Ganas” to mean
“Lord of the Hosts,”[76]
or “Lord of Created Categories,” such as the elements.
Lord of the Hosts is an
expression which can be found elsewhere, namely in the Bible—in
Yahweh Sabaoth. Some say that, too, means Lord of the Hosts
and identify Yahweh Sabaoth as a God of War. Now, who was the
main War God? Ares.
Let’s revisit Babylon
again.
Quote #31: In the late
Babylonian astral-theological system Nergal is related to
the planet Mars. As a fiery god of destruction and war,
Nergal doubtless seemed an appropriate choice for the red
planet, and he was equated by the Greeks either to the
combative demigod Heracles (Latin Hercules) or to the
war-god Ares (Latin Mars) -- hence the current name of the
planet. In Assyro-Babylonian ecclesiastical art, the great
lion-headed colossi serving as guardians to the temples and
palaces seems to symbolise Nergal, just as the bull-headed
colossi probably typifies Ninurta.[77]
Now we can see that there
is a link between Ganesha, Nergal, and Ares across the different
mythologies. Even Apollo has links to Nergal and the Underworld:
Quote #32: The Hebrew term
Abaddon (Hebrew:
אֲבַדּוֹן, 'Ǎḇaddōn),
and its Greek equivalent Apollyon (Greek:
Ἀπολλύων, Apollyon), appear in the Bible as a place
of destruction and an angel, respectively. In the Hebrew
Bible, abaddon is used with reference to a bottomless pit,
often appearing alongside the place
שאול (sheol), meaning the land of the dead.[78]
My point here is that all
these deities can be traced up and down and back and forth, and
we still end up with Marduk. Very few people have made such
connections before, but they need to be made because the
gods, if they appear, may refer to themselves as one or more of
these old deities in order to make themselves look good! The
reader is now smarter than to swallow their propaganda.
However, I know there are
well-known researchers out there who are currently
trying to connect Apollo with very benevolent forces by
making incorrect associations. These researchers and the
associations they make can sound very credible at first, but
they will not be able to prove their claims. If the reader
ever stands before something like that, try to remember what I
said here. The evidence is in these papers.
Now, for those who were
surprised over the AIF’s control of our chakras and Kundalini,
here is another reference, directly referring to Ganesha, aka
Marduk (my emphasis is in italics):
Quote #33: According to
Kundalini yoga, Ganesha resides in the first chakra, called
Muladhara (mūlādhāra). Mula means "original, main"; adhara
means "base, foundation". The muladhara chakra is the
principle on which the manifestation or outward expansion of
primordial Divine Force rests.[94] This association is also
attested to in the Ganapati Atharvashirsa. Courtright
translates this passage as follows: "[O Ganesha,] You
continually dwell in the sacral plexus at the base of the
spine [mūlādhāra cakra]."[95] Thus, Ganesha has a
permanent abode in every being at the Muladhara.[96] Ganesha
holds, supports and guides all other chakras, thereby
"governing the forces that propel the wheel of life".[79]
This is another thing that
I certainly haven’t been “sitting on.” I didn’t know this until
I started researching the Vedas, but it certainly means that an
additional thing we need to do is to get back to be in charge of
our chakras. We will discuss this in Paper #16. This is very
important, as the reader most certainly understands, so bear
with me until we get to that paper. The reader may see now why
these levels of learning can be quite massive (many pages), but
we have a lot to cover.
v.iii. Skanda and the Seven Sisters of the
Pleiades
Skanda, who also goes under
other names, such as Kartikeya and Murugan, is another
interesting deity, or Avatar, which probably would be a better
term. Most of these deities are Avatars—that’s what they really
are; Avatars of the “higher” gods.
Skanda is the Commander of
the Gods—at least outside of the Highest Lokas, and especially
here on Earth. His “brother” is Ganesha, whom we discussed in
the previous subsection, and his vehicle is the RAM (a clear
association to Marduk).
In the Purānas, Skanda is
the son of Shiva (Marduk), but at the same time brother of
Ganesha. This, of course, doesn’t make sense on an analytical
level. However, what they often did in the Vedic literature was
to refer to an Avatar as their “son,” just as Jesus could be
said to be an Avatar of En.ki. Thus, being a “brother” of
Ganesha and a son of Shiva and an Avatar of Shiva would make
Skanda the counterpart of Marduk. This also makes sense when we
read the whole complicated story of Skanda, which we don’t have
time to go into here, but it is easy to find online for those
who are interested.
Let’s instead examine the
most fascinating aspects of Skanda/Marduk. The ancient texts
tell us that Skanda as Murugan was raised by six sisters, known
as the “Kṛttikā.”
We’re taught the following:
Quote #34: In Hindu
mythology, the god Skanda was raised by the six sisters
known as the Kṛttikā
and thus came to be known as Kartikeya (literally "Him of
the Kṛttikā").
According to the Mahābhārata, Kartikeya was born to Agni and
Svāhā, after the latter impersonated six of the seven wives
of the Saptarṣi
and made love to him. The Saptarshi, hearing of this
incident and doubting their wives' chastity, divorced them.
These wives then became the Kṛttikā.[80]
Just to clarify; the
“Saptrarshi” mentioned in the above quote are the “Seven Rishis”
(Sages), who are mentioned frequently throughout the Vedas. They
are basically regarded as the “patriarchs of the Vedic
religion.”[81]
What Quote #34 actually says
is that the Seven Rishis (said to be very wise) are doubting the
wives’ morality when it comes to sexual relationships. In other
words, the Kṛttikā
are immoral. However, who are the Kṛttikā?
(My emphasis in italics.)
Quote #35: The star
cluster Kṛttikā
(Sanskrit:
कृत्तिका, pronounced [kr̩t̪t̪ikɑː],
popularly transliterated "Krittika") sometimes known as
Kārtikā, corresponds to the open star cluster called
Pleiades in western astronomy, it is one of the clusters
which makes up the constellation Taurus.[82]
Here we have a direct link
between the Kṛttikā,
the Pleiades, and the Constellation of Taurus. The Rishis are
also saying that the Seven Sisters of the Pleiades are sexually
immoral, which makes much sense. The reader may or may not
recall, but we discussed in Level IV how the Pleiadians came
down to Earth as the “Fallen Angels” and impregnated the
gorgeous looking human females just for the sexual sensation of
it. This was most certainly done by the Pleiadians becoming
“walk ins” in existing human males and manipulating human
females to have sex with them—in many cases, they literally
raped them. Then they used the Pleiadian Giant genes and mixed
them with human DNA (all with En.ki’s consent), and the
offspring became Giants. I am not making this up; it was
admitted to by the channeled group of Pleiadians, who are hosted
by Barbara Marciniak’s body. Hence, we can definitely say
that the Pleiadians were “sexually immoral” to use a mild term.
In reality, they broke every universal law they could in regard
to not interfering with an evolving group of humanoids.
Moreover, they broke every rule under the Law of Free Will.
These crimes do not go unnoticed, and supposedly, the Pleiadians
who are now lecturing through Marciniak’s vessel are here to
make amends for what their ancestors were doing to Homo sapiens
ages ago. Apparently, these Pleiadians can’t continue evolving
until they have made amends for what their ancestors did. Mind
you; this is their version of why they are here now, but
from having listened to them, and with the knowledge base I
have, I can see that there is a much bigger agenda behind their
being here. To understand this concept, please read
The Third Level of Learning, which goes into
depth about channeling.
There is one thing,
however, which I need to introduce regarding the Pleiades before
we move on. The Pleiades, which are a part of the Constellation
of Taurus, were also where En.ki as Lucifer took refuge after
the Rebellion War, and Aldebaran became perhaps his most
important outpost in Sector 9—our sector of the Milky Way
Galaxy. This is more or less backed up by Marciniak’s Pleiadians
as well. Although they admit that En.ki has his flaws, similar
to the rest of the Anunnaki, En.ki is the one who has been the
Pleiadians’ mentor during the Nanosecond. Hence, they often put
En.ki in a good light. As the reader can see, there are very few
sources we can trust, although there are good sources
here, believe it or not. However, there’s not much they can do
if we humans don’t come to our senses, wake up to the reality
that we live in, and stop agreeing with being manipulated. Not
until then—if we ask for it—can we get some help from beings who
have been on our side since the beginning of our imprisonment.
This means that we could have lessened our suffering and
decreased our prison time here if we had used more of our smarts
and not been so comfortable with the toys that have been handed
to us.
Nevertheless, after these
important side notes, let’s return to where we were. We now know
that Skanda was raised by six of the Seven Sisters, but what
happened then, when Skanda grew up?
Quote #36: In Hindu
astrology, Kṛttikā
is the third of the 27 nakṣatras.
It is ruled by Kartikeya.[83]
Now we know that Marduk is
a ruler of the Pleiades. Now read the following quote (no need
to understand this entire quote, just take in the concept of
it.)
Quote #37: The first
elaborate account of Kartikeya's origin occurs in the
Mahabharata. In a complicated story, he is said to have been
born from Agni and Svāha, after the latter impersonated the
six of the seven wives of the Saptarishi (Seven Sages). The
actual wives then become the Pleiades. Kartikeya is said to
have been born to destroy the Asura Mahisha.[9] (In later
mythology, Mahisha became the adversary of Durga.) Indra
attacks Kartikeya as he sees the latter as a threat, until
Shiva intervenes and makes Kartikeya the commander-in-chief
of the army of the Devas. He is also married to Devasena,
Indra's daughter. The origin of this marriage lies probably
in the punning of 'Deva-sena-pati'. It can mean either lord
of Devasena or Lord of the army (sena) of Devas.[citation
needed] But according to Shrii Shrii Anandamurti, in his
master work on Shiva[10] and other works, Kartikeya was
married to Devasenā and that is on the ground of his name as
Devasena's husband, Devasenāpati, misinterpreted as
Deva-senāpati (Deva's general) that he was granted the title
general and made the Deva's army general.[84]
I agree that this is a
complicated story, but we can understand how Shiva, the main
“god soul,” is intervening with his own avatar and helps him
become a general of the Deva army. More importantly, it looks as
if, at this point, due to wars and intrigues, there is some kind
of migration from Ursa Major to the Pleiades by some gods. Or
because of conflicts, some are cast out of Ursa Major and
relocate to the Pleiades. It looks as if Marduk is finding
refuge in his father’s domain in Taurus!
Finally, regarding Skanda,
again we can see the direct link between him and Marduk:
Quote #38: Like most Hindu
deities, Subrahmanya is known by many other names, including
Senthil, Vēlaṇ,
Kumāran (meaning 'prince or child or young one'), Swaminatha
(meaning 'smart' or 'clever'), Saravaṇa,
Arumugam or Shanmuga (meaning 'one with six faces'),
Dandapāni (meaning God with a Club), Guhan or Guruguha
(meaning 'cave-dweller')...[85]
We are back to the
Underworld and “cave-dweller” again. It seems as if whenever we
research these beings, it comes back to the Underworld and the
Afterlife. They have made sure that that particular reference is
there, in the open, or halfway hidden.
Now, let us make some more
Vedic association with Marduk, and then we’ll move on to portray
the infamous “Queen of the Underworld,” thus far mostly known as
Ereškigal.
v.iv. Tvastar and Viśwákarman
Tvastar (or Tvaṣṭṛ)
was born from the navel of the invisible Viśwákarman, known in
the Hindu text as the “blacksmith” of the Hindu gods—the being
who designed and created all the Vimānas, tools, and weapons for
the gods, to use in daily life and in devastating wars.[86]
Tvastar is also known as the “visible” creator, while
Viśwákarman is the “invisible one,” working more behind the
scenes. This is, as we will see, only another way of describing
Avatars. I will prove to the readers that Viśwákarman is the
equivalent to the “invisible” Marduk and is just another name
for Shiva. Tvastar, on the other hand, is one of Viśwákarman’s
Avatars, and is thus an incarnation of Marduk.
However, this “duo,”
Viśwákarman and Tvastar, is an interesting one because the two
elevated themselves as the “Architect of the Universe.” From
there, it becomes quite fascinating.
v.iv.i. Viśwákarman—Blacksmith of the Hindu
Gods
Viśwákarman, whom I’ve
decided to present side by side with his Avatar, Tvastar, has,
according to the Rigveda, the following characteristics:
Quote #39: Viśwákarman is
the personified Omnipotence and the abstract form of the
creator God according to the Rigveda. He is the presiding
deity of all craftsmen and architects.[1] He is believed to
be the "Principal Architect of the Universe ", and the root
concept of the later Upanishadic Brahman / Purusha.[87]
Most readers who have
reached the point where they are ready to absorb material such
as these papers already know about the Illuminati and the
Freemasons. If there is somebody out there who has missed
it, I’ll quickly let you know that Freemasonry is worshipping a
“God” that is the “Great Architect of the Universe.” This is the
being they call God, period. Well, Christians, and even many
people subscribing to other religions, attack Freemasonry and
say that their God is not the God of the Old Testament,
but in fact is an occult term for Lucifer, the “Lightbearer.” (I
am not going to provide any proof for all this here because it’s
very simple to find the evidence just by googling it—there is
sufficient evidence out there. I also created a gigantic website
database, updated between 1998-2009,
http://illuminati-news.com/, which more or less
exclusively discusses these subjects.) The lower-level
Freemasons, in turn, defend themselves and say that this is
nonsense—that they are not Satanic worshippers and that the
Christians and others have it wrong.
Fig.8. Viśwákarman.
Testimonies from insiders
and whistleblowers amongst high-level Freemasons, however, prove
that their organization indeed worship Lucifer, and that it’s he
who is the “Great Architect of the Universe.” According to some
of them, the eye on the capstone of the Great Pyramid of Giza,
portrayed on the back of the American One Dollar Bill as well,
is, in fact, the “Eye of Lucifer,” (see fig. 9 below).
Others say it’s the “Eye of Horus,” which would indicate Marduk
(Osiris is En.ki, and Horus is En.ki’s and Isis’ son, which
makes him Marduk). As the reader can determine, we have two
beings claiming to be the “Great Architect;” En.ki and Marduk.
In Freemasonry, they are depicted as Lucifer and Horus, or
Osiris and Horus. Hence, the Eye on top of the pyramid can
symbolize both En.ki and Marduk.
Fig. 9. The “Eye of Lucifer/Horus” on the back of the U.S. One
Dollar Bill (see left).
This entire matter proves
that at one point in time, the roles of Queen Nin and Khan
En.lil were taken over by “lesser” gods, who since then have
pretended to be the Creators of the Universe. If the reader goes
back in the text and reviews Quote
#39, you will see that it states that Viśwákarman is the
Architect of the Universe, and consequently, also the Brahman.
These titles, as has been proven earlier, belong to the Queen of
the Stars, and above Her, the Divine Feminine—the Multiversal
life force that is in everything in this universe and all
others, from what we understand.
Quote #39 alone is good evidence that En.ki and Marduk,
in liaison with their partners in crime, not only took over the
Earth but also the titles of the real Creatrix of the Multiverse
and Her consort.
However, it would not be
surprising in the end, when En.ki and his son are standing trial
for what they have done that they defend themselves and say that
when they stated that they were the Architect and the Brahman,
they meant that these titles were implying the holographic
universe he had created for humanity to live in (the 4%), and
not the Universe which the Queen of the Stars had created. I
think it’s quite naďve if he thinks they would get away with
that, but you can’t know exactly how these beings are thinking.
v.iv.ii. Hiraṇyagarbha
Fig. 10. Hiraṇyagarbha.
This is one of many material universes, Brahmāṇḍa,
which expand from Mahā Viṣṇu
when he breathes.
Now, let us study the
Hiraṇyagarbha—one
of many material universes (fig. 10). Again, Marduk in
the guise of Viśwákarman, is taking on the role of the Creator
of the particular universe we live in.
Quote #40: Hiraṇyagarbha
(Devanagari:
हिरण्यगर्भः ; literally the 'golden womb' or 'golden
egg', poetically rendered 'universal germ') is the source of
the creation of the Universe or the manifested cosmos in
Indian philosophy,[1] it finds mention in one hymn of the
Ṛigveda (RV
10.121), known as the 'Hiraṇyagarbha
Sūkta', suggesting a single creator deity (verse 8: yo deveṣv
ādhi devā eka āsīt, Griffith:" He is the God of gods, and
none beside him."), in the hymn identified as Prajāpati The
concept golden womb is again mentioned in Viswakarma suktha
Rg 10-82.
The Upaṇiṣad
calls it the Soul of the Universe or Brahman,[2] and
elaborates that Hiraṇyagarbha
floated around in emptiness and the darkness of the
non-existence for about a year, and then broke into two
halves which formed the Svarga and the Pṛthvi.
In classical Purāṇic
Hinduism, Hiraṇyagarbha
is a name of Brahmā, so called because he was born from a
golden egg (Manu Smṛti
1.9), while the Mahābhārata calls it the Manifest.[88]
This is another very
interesting reference. Again, we have the egg-shaped universe,
which is the predominant hypothesis behind Life Physics Group
California’s (LPG-C’s) metaphysical and quantum mechanical
“Working Model;” something they claimed was not a hypothesis,
[89] but a proven fact.[90]
I am not disputing that the Universe is egg-shaped (there are
other scientists saying the same thing), but in the sense of
LPG-C, they received much of their information directly from the
AIF.
The Sages are making very
bold statements in the Purāṇas, the Rigveda, and in other
scriptures, when they make the claims included in
Quote #40. They are basically
elevating Vishnu/Viśwákarman to become the Prime Creator. This
is not coming as any kind of surprise, of course, as this has
been done many times over, but in these scriptures, it makes it
very “solid” and is not open for any kind of interpretations.
v.iv.iii. The Golden Grounding Cord
Now, let me make the reader
aware of something else concerning the Hiraṇyagarbha:
Quote #41: Post-classical yoga traditions
consider Hiranyagarbha as the originator of yoga.[91]
I am introducing this here
just to make sure the readers don’t think that yoga is something
really bad because it is originating with the Hindu texts and
Lord Vishnu. If you are a yoga practitioner, or a teacher, I
would advise you to continue and not stop because of what is
revealed here. However, I think it’s very important that you
create the golden cord and the golden aura around yourself
before you start practicing. If you have forgotten how to do it,
it’s simple: imagine yourself creating a robust golden cord that
reaches all the way to the center of the Earth, and at the
bottom of this cord you create a giant diamond, or any other
precious stone that you are particularly fond of. Then you
create a golden aura around yourself, and this aura should be
connected to the cord and reach from side to side and front to
back so that your whole body is covered. Make this aura, let’s
say five inches outside of your visible body. By doing this, you
not only ground yourself, but also demonstrate to non-physical
beings that you are serious, and that you are a strong person
who knows what it’s all about, and you are claiming your
sovereignty; telling everybody that no one is allowed to mess
with you.[92]
This is actually something
I suggest that everybody does several times a day—when you have
done it for a while, it becomes a routine, and you can do it in
a couple of seconds. Do it first thing in the morning when you
wake up and then throughout the day, until it’s time to go to
bed. Finally, do it one last time before you go to sleep (very
important). Believe it or not, but this will make a big
difference and will keep entities away.
Can I prove it? Although
the results are subjective, I believe I can assure a positive
result if it is done properly. Do it, and you will notice
a difference! Also, if you teach yoga (or any other metaphysical
classes), make sure you include the “Golden Grounding Cord
Practice” in the classes—please! Also equally important as I
have stated many times—do a
breathing exercise before and after the yoga class! If you
incorporate these two practices, you may get astonishing
results, and your students will be happy and stay with you.
I had some problems in the
beginning to remember to implement the Golden Grounding Cord
practice several times a day, but now it occurs naturally, and
it’s quite rare that I forget to do it. I’m sure that those who
take this seriously will gain quite a lot from it.
v.iv.iv. Tvastar
Last, when it comes to
Marduk and his counterparts, let us move over to Viśwákarman’s
Avatar, Tvastar, and prove beyond a doubt that he really is
Marduk, which in turn, also proves that Viśwákarman is Marduk as
well because the former is the latter’s Avatar.
Quote #42: Tvaṣṭṛ
is a solar deity in the epic of Mahābhārata and the Harivaṃśa.
He is mentioned as the son of Kāśyapa and Aditi, and is said
to have made the three worlds with pieces of the Sun god
Surya. The surname of south indian goldsmiths Thattar
(Tamil:
தட்டர்) is probably derived
from the term Tvoshtar.[93]
As we discussed in Paper 6
under the section, “How the Vedic Gods Set up their Manipulative
System,” Kāśyapa is the equivalent of En.ki, and earlier in this
paper, I explained that Aditi, who originally is another name
for Queen Nin, can also be many different deities; in this case,
Kāśyapa’s consort. Nonetheless, it explains that Tvastar is the
son of Kāśyapa, i.e. En.ki, which makes Tvastar the equivalent
to Marduk. In Quote #42 he is
also presented as a Sun god (solar deity).
Generally, “everybody
knows” that in the New Testament of the Bible, Jesus is a
carpenter, which basically means he is a “builder,” or a
“creator god.” I have earlier given hints that Jesus and En.ki
are one and the same, which in many ways makes sense.
Nevertheless, in the Viśwákarman/Tvastar story, the two present
themselves both as Queen Nin (Creator of the Universe) and Lord
En.ki, respectively, the same mix back and forth appears in the
New Testament. Be very careful not to always make clear
distinctions between En.ki and Marduk because if we do, we’re
going to create some serious contradictions. The two
intentionally took each other’s roles at times, and it was not
always to confuse the masses. Such is also the case with the
biblical god Jehovah and his schizophrenic behavior. En.ki
sometimes was, as we discussed a few sections ago, the “King of
Sun gods,” despite our knowing that Marduk is the typical Sun
deity. Even Jesus was a typical Sun god, which is clearly
demonstrated by his halo.
Quote #43: With it not
being found in the Bible, the halo is both pagan and
non-Christian in its origin. Many centuries before Christ,
natives decorated their heads with a crown of feathers to
represent their relationship with the sun god. The halo of
feathers upon their heads symbolized the circle of light
that distinguished the shining divinity or god in the sky.
As a result, these people came to believe that adopting such
a nimbus or halo transformed them into a kind of divine
being.
However, interestingly
enough, before the time of Christ, this symbol had already
been used by not only the Hellenistic Greeks in 300 B.C.,
but also by the Buddhists as early as the first century A.D.
In Hellenistic and Roman art, the sun-god, Helios, and Roman
emperors often appear with a crown of rays. Because of its
pagan origin, the form was avoided in early Christian art,
but a simple circular nimbus was adopted by Christian
emperors for their official portraits.[94]
This is highly symbolic and
would indicate that Jesus could have been either En.ki or Marduk,
or both (or even better—their Avatars). All these alternatives
could potentially be correct, but Jesus, too, was demonstrating
both En.ki’s more controlled behavior and Marduk’s outbursts, as
demonstrated when he tipped over the table in wrath at the
marketplace because he was upset with the merchants (the
bankers). However, I want to return to the carpenter subject
and provide an interesting reference to Tvastar. Michael Jordan,
in “Encyclopedia of Gods,” writes the following:
Quote #44: Tvastar,
carpenter, is a Hindu creator god, mentioned in the
Vedas, and referred to as the "divine builder" who fashions
living creatures on earth … He is an aditya, or sun god, and
father of Saranyu. His attributes are the homajakalika,
an uncertain fire device, ladle, and two lotuses. A.G.H.[95]
Tvastar, just as Jesus, is
said to have been a carpenter, so there are definitely things
that associate the two, as well as there are things that
associate En.ki with Jesus.
In this paper, I have given
the reader a few things to ponder in regards to En.ki and Marduk,
as presented in the Vedas. As usual, I have only scratched the
surface, and this is not only because of space limitations. I
also want the readers to be able to look up other deities in the
ancient Hindu texts, do the research—including using
syncretism—and see which Sumerian/Egyptian/Greek/Roman god or
goddess they come up with. I am convinced that whomever the
reader decides to research, there is a counterpart in the other
mythologies, in other parts of the world.
VI. Isis, Inanna, Ishtar, Lilith, and
Aphrodite
Establishing that these
five female deities are one and the same takes care of many
headaches when researching the different deities. Albeit all
five of them, mythologically, have traits that are quite similar
to each other, they are also made different because it may have
“pleased” the Sages of old—or rather Marduk or En.ki, depending
on which one was dictating a certain story. Also, we should not
forget that Ereškigal, Queen of the Underworld, is connected to
these five counterparts as well—particularly Isis and Inanna.
These conflated goddesses
have of course their counterparts in the Hindu religion, too,
and in the effort to find them, we can also establish further
evidence of the conflation. To do so, interestingly, I am even
going to present some African mythology, stemming from the
Nigerian region.
vi.i. Lakshmi, the Goddess of Fertility,
Love, Beauty, and Wealth
Sometimes, the easiest and
best way to find out if two deities—in this case goddesses—are
counterparts is to look at their characteristics. Amongst other
characteristics that are sovereign to a specific goddess, the
five goddesses mentioned above also have characteristics that
they all share. Such traits are fertility, love, beauty, and
wealth, as we discussed in Level IV. Hence, let us look for
these and see if we can find a goddess in the Vedas, or in any
other Hindu scripture, who matches at least two, if not more, of
the four characteristics.
After some search efforts,
I found a goddess named Lakshmi. Let’s review some data
on her:
Quote #45: Lakshmi
(Sanskrit:
लक्ष्मी lakṣmī,
Hindi pronunciation: [ˈləkʃmi]) is the Hindu goddess
of wealth, love, prosperity (both material and spiritual),
fortune, and the embodiment of beauty. She is the wife of
Vishnu. Also known as Mahalakshmi, she is said to bring good
luck and is believed to protect her devotees from all kinds
of misery and money-related sorrows.[96]
Bingo! Lakshmi has all of
these characteristics. Here is also a reference to being the
consort of Vishnu, which is another thing I brought up in Level
IV concerning the five goddesses and which is now also evident
in the Hindu religion. For those who recall, Isis, being Prince
Ninurta’s (Prince En.lil’s) daughter, was raped by his brother,
En.ki/Nergal and “forced” to stay in the Underworld with him and
create his offspring. Ereškigal and Inanna are said to be
sisters, and Ereškigal takes over the role of Isis/Inanna when
the latter flees, to En.ki’s surprise and annoyance. A new
branch of Homo sapiens, usually called Homo sapiens sapiens, is
then created by Nergal and Ereškigal, and later, yet another
branch of mankind is created by Marduk and Ereškigal, when En.ki
loses his manhood, as a consequence after Prince Ninurta
confronted him in the Rigel star system and chopped off En.ki’s
phallus in revenge for raping his daughter. Ninurta also puts a
curse on En.ki so that he can never reproduce again.
Fig. 11. Lakshmi
Just to compare Lakshmi
with the other counterparts, let’s revisit two of them that we
just discussed—Inanna and Ishtar; both mentioned in the same
reference.
Quote #46: Inanna (/ɪˈnćnə/
or /ɪˈnɑːnə/;
Cuneiform: 𒀭𒈹 (Old Babylonian) or DINGIRINANNA
(Neo-Assyrian) DMUŠ3; Sumerian: Inanna; Akkadian: Ištar;
Unicode: U+12239) is the Sumerian goddess of love,
fertility, and warfare, and goddess of the E-Anna temple at
the city of Uruk, her main centre.[97]
As we can see, Inanna/Ishtar
is the goddess of love and fertility, according to this
reference, but also of warfare. Now, by researching Aphrodite,
we get an even broader picture of the traits of this particular
combined goddess:
Quote #47: Aphrodite (Listeni/ćfrəˈdaɪti/
af-rə-dy-tee;
Greek:
Ἀφροδίτη) is the Greek goddess of love, beauty,
pleasure, and procreation. Her Roman equivalent is the
goddess Venus.[98]
Thus, we can add pleasure
and procreation to the list. It doesn’t really matter which
religion or mythology we look at—this goddess is portrayed as
the goddess of love and sexuality. The way I see it, “love,” in
this sense, has very little to do with deep caring for another
being —something we connect with love—instead, love and sex are
more or less the same thing.
Although my main focus in
this level of learning has been the Vedas and the Hindu religion
in general, it’s inevitable to now and then stumble upon other
mythologies and religions as well when researching a certain
deity. So was the case with Lakshmi and Aphrodite. Level V has
very little to do with African religions per se, but when I see
a reference that includes those religions, I’d very much like to
include the reference because it proves that the AIF really
were spread out all over the planet, and the records of them
can be found in all four corners of the world, as it were. The
Yoruba religion is practiced in southwestern Nigeria,[99]
and still we’ll find the same deities there.
Quote #48: Oshun, or Ochun
(pronounced [ɔʃún])
in the Yoruba religion, is an Orisha who reigns over love,
intimacy, beauty, wealth and diplomacy. She is worshiped
also in Brazilian Candomblé Ketu, with the name spelled Oxum.
She should not be confused, however, with a different Orisha
of a similar name spelled "Osun," who is the protector of
the Ori, or our heads and inner souls. Ochun relates mostly
to woman but also man.
Ọṣhun
is beneficent, generous and very kind. She does, however,
have a horrific temper, one which she seldom ever loses.
When she does, it causes untold destruction. Oshun is said
to have gone to a drum festival one day and to have fallen
in love with the king-dancer Shango, god of lightning &
thunder. Since that day, Shango has been married to Oba, Oya,
and Oshun, though Oshun is said to be considered his
principal wife.[100]
Oshun, carrying the same
characteristics as the other goddesses, was also married to a
god named Shango, according to the above reference—and what do
we know?! Shango is the god of lightning & thunder. Who
else is always related to lightning and thunder? Zeus, aka
Marduk! Then again, who “married” Isis when En.ki lost his
infamous sexual abilities? Marduk did, albeit Ereškigal
eventually took over the role of Isis. Regardless, we can see
how myths “travel” to the most distant places.
Speaking of distant
places—interestingly enough, Oshun is also worshipped in Brazil.
That’s not even the same continent! Words travel in mysterious
ways, don’t they? Or did the gods just tell the Sages what to
write down?
From Brazil, let us travel
a little bit north until we come to Cuba. According to
Quote #48, Oshun became Oxum
in Brazilian mythology. Not so in Cuba, albeit the two locations
can be said to belong to the same continent. In Cuba, this
goddess is worshipped under the same name as in Africa—Oshun!
With the risk of sounding like a broken record—words travel in
mysterious ways!
Let’s see what Cuban
mythology has to say about Isis/Oshun.
Quote #49: In Cuban
Santería, Oshun (sometimes spelled Ochún or Ochun) is an
Orisha of love, maternity and marriage. She has been
syncretized with Our Lady of Charity (La Virgen de la
Caridad del Cobre), Cuba's patroness. She is associated with
the color yellow, metal brass,[1] peacock feathers, mirrors,
honey and anything of beauty, her principal day of the week
is Saturday and the number she is associated with is 5. She
is the river goddess.[101]
Although Inanna has “calmed
down” here and has become more traditional in the sense that her
hyper-sexuality is removed, there is no doubt that we are still
reading about the same deity but in another part of the world.
Here she is related to Saturday, which is the day of Saturn,
i.e. En.ki; so the connection is still there. In Nigeria,
however, Oshun/Inanna is still a very sexual goddess as relayed
in the following part of the African Oshun tale: “The dance of
Oshun is the most sensual one. She laughs as Yemaya and shakes
her arms to sound her bracelets. Oshun raises her arms over the
head to emphasize her enchantments. While she dances, she makes
sexual movements and asks for sex to the men with her extended
hands and abrupt movements of her hips.”[102]
She is also sometimes depicted as a vulture,[103]
which indicates her Bird Tribe ancestry.
I am not the only one who
has found the link between Oshun and Isis. Jide Uwechia, the
owner of the website Rasta Livewire,[104]
makes the same discovery:
Quote #50: Like Egyptian
Isis and later Greek Diana, Osun is the goddess of love and
is widely beloved. She is known for healing the sick,
cheering the sad, bringing music, song and dance, as well as
bringing fertility and prosperity.[105]
I also wanted to include
the Cuban version here for a particular reason—it says here that
she is the “river goddess.” I would like the reader to keep that
in mind for the next subsection. Likewise, the river might, on a
superficial level, refer to the river that flows close to where
the goddess is worshipped, but on a deeper level, the river
refers to the Universe itself. The Universe is symbolically
called the “Ocean” on a metaphysical level, and the “River” is
therefore the flow of energy through the Universe. In due time,
I will present to the reader why I bring this up in this
particular circumstance.
vi.ii. Dānu, the River Goddess
As mentioned at the end of
the last section, there is another Hindu reference to Isis et
al., which includes the river. Her name is Dānu.
Quote #51: Dānu, a Hindu
primordial goddess, is mentioned in the Rigveda, mother of
the Danavas. The word Danu described the primeval waters
which this deity perhaps embodied. In the Rigveda (I.32.9),
she is identified as the mother of Vrtra, the demonic
serpent slain by Indra.[1] In later Hinduism, she becomes
the daughter of Daksha and the consort of Kasyapa.
As a word for "rain" or
"liquid", dānu is compared to Avestan dānu "river", and
further to river names like Don, Danube, Dneiper, Dniestr,
etc. There is also a Danu river in Nepal. The "liquid" word
is mostly neuter, but appears as feminine in RV 1.54.[106]
The “Ocean” is the metaphor
for the Universe as a whole—all 100% of it, and it symbolizes
energy. The Ocean is what we call Mother Goddess or the Divine
Feminine. The “River” is the currents in the Ocean, which can
perhaps be best explained as the movement of energy. A Goddess,
who is not the real Mother Goddess, might be of such
nature that she can control some Rivers in the Divine “Waters.”
The children and grandchildren of the Orion Queen would, as I
see it, be in control of some Rivers because they have learned
how. En.ki, however, is associating himself with the Ocean
rather than the River because he thinks of himself as being able
to create universes. After all, he might reason, he was able to
create the holographic universe that we are manipulated into
believing is the real universe. He is just as much a Creator God
as the Goddess Herself, he might think, because he created the
“Matrix.” Isis, however, is the River Goddess, and supposedly
Khan En.lil’s favorite—something Sitchin recognized as well,
albeit he called Khan En.lil by the title, Anu—Heaven the
Orion Empire.
There is another reference
to Isis or Inanna in the Vedas, but I have already included her
in Paper #7. Her name is Atargatis, and she was discussed
under the “mermaid” section, which I called, “IV. What Did All
The Sailors See? Were They All Just Drunk, or are Mermaids for
Real???” For those who are interested, or need a reminder, I
strongly recommend that the reader returns to that section for a
review.
VII. Ereškigal—the Goddess of Death
Perhaps, the most important
goddess for the AIF is Ereškigal, the Queen of the Underworld.
Just because she is a goddess of the world below doesn’t mean
that she is always dwelling there, just as En.ki is not always
dwelling in, and under, the oceans because he’s associated with
them. It only means that the Underworld and the oceans are
Ereškigal’s and En.ki’s domains—respectively. En.ki, for
example, has many domains, and the Underworld is another domain
that he shares with the Queen of Death, when he’s known as
Nergal.
There is an elderly woman
that I have been in contact with, who claims to be Ereškigal in
a current human incarnation. I have no way of proving whether
she is or is not, but she is very insistent about it. She also
claims that she was born into the House of Windsor, which
doesn’t surprise me at all, however.
If it fits the purpose,
whether they are “for real” or “Intelligence Agents,” they try
to take on a friendly and caring approach—in this woman’s case,
she is even working on exposing her “own kind” (the Anunnaki)
because she claims that she was thrown out of the Windsor family
at some point! Her exposure, however, shouldn’t be taken too
seriously because she is exposing it from a Sitchin point of
view, which is the “safe” way of doing it because that version
was meant to be published—I’m convinced that the AIF
supported Sitchin.
Funny also is that when I
exposed Ereškigal in my papers, together with all the “Anunnaki”
she associated with, she was quick to agree with me, saying that
this evil agenda must stop (and she was not referring to me as
the one with an “evil agenda”). Later, I discovered that she is
continuing to “expose” things from a Sitchin perspective.
Why am I mentioning this?
Because I want to caution the reader about what is out there.
This woman contacted me shortly after I’d been contacted by Utu
Šamaš, aka Marduk, and she referred to him as her brother, which
would have been correct if I’d followed Sitchin’s presentation.
Instead, I would say that Ereškigal currently is Marduk’s lover
and consort. In her relationship with me and the general public,
she is acting like a cozy mother, or a grandmother, and there is
apparently nothing that I say or write that can shake her stable
grandmother attitude. She continues her friendly approach even
when proven wrong but does not change her viewpoint on things.
This is either mind control or the real thing—people such as
her, Supriem, James Casbolt (aka Michael Prince), and others are
not doing what they are doing “for fun.” They believe who they
are, which means that there is more to the picture than meets
the eye.
With this, let us leave
present time for a while and return to the mythological world of
the old Hindu religion. Let us meet with Kali, the most vicious
female goddess in the Vedic scriptures.
vii.i. Kali—Shiva’s Consort
We have discussed Shakti
a few times in this level of learning. For the main part, I
have associated Shakti with Devi, the Mother of all Creation,
i.e. Mother Goddess, the Divine Feminine. However, if we
continue researching, we will find other aspects of Shakti as
well—a much darker concept of the term, which does not seem to
fit with Mother Goddess at all.
I will present what I mean
in the following reference, which also gives us an introduction
to Kali (or Kālī).
Quote #52: The first
appearance of Kāli in her present form is in the Sauptika
Parvan of the Mahabharata (10.8.64). She is called Kālarātri (literally,
"black night") and appears to the Pandava soldiers in
dreams, until finally she appears amidst the fighting during
an attack by Drona's son Ashwatthama. She most famously
appears in the sixth century Devi Mahatmyam as one of the shaktis of Mahadevi,
and defeats the demon Raktabija ("Bloodseed").[107]
Here it says that she
appears as one of the shaktis—not as the Shakti.
Wikipedia has a fairly good definition of Shakti, and I want to
bring this up because it is important to distinguish the
Shakti (Mother Goddess) from shakti as a general term.
Quote #53: Shakti
(Sanskrit pronunciation: [ˈʃʌktɪ])
(Devanagari:
शक्ति; from Sanskrit shak, "to be able"), meaning
"Power" or "empowerment," is the primordial cosmic energy
and represents the dynamic forces that are thought to move
through the entire universe in Hinduism.[1] Shakti is the
concept, or personification, of divine feminine creative
power, sometimes referred to as 'The Great Divine Mother' in
Hinduism. On the earthly plane, shakti most actively
manifests through female embodiment and
creativity/fertility, though it is also present in males in
its potential, unmanifest form.[108]
As we can see here, the
word really stands both for the Goddess of All, but on the
earthly plane, “shakti most actively manifests through female
embodiment and creativity/fertility, though it is also present
in males in its potential, unmanifest form.” Everything is of
the Divine Feminine, and shakti therefore also refers to when
someone uses female creativity and fertility, for example.
Kali is maybe the one
character of the AIF that I appreciate writing about the most,
only because she is such an obvious AIF character, the way I
depict them. How she is described in the Vedic texts is quite
revealing, in my opinion. Let us continue with some important
characteristics of this charismatic “goddess.”
Quote #54 Kālī (Sanskrit: काली, IPA: [kɑːliː]),
also known as Kālikā (Sanskrit: कालिका), is
the Hindu goddess associated with empowerment, shakti. She
is the fierce aspect of the goddess Durga (Parvati). The
name Kali comes from kāla, which means black, time, death,
lord of death, Shiva. Since Shiva is called Kāla—the eternal
time—Kālī, his consort, also means "Time" or "Death" (as in
time has come). Hence, Kāli is the Goddess of Time and
Change. Although sometimes presented as dark and violent,
her earliest incarnation as a figure of annihilation of evil
forces still has some influence. Various Shakta Hindu
cosmologies, as well as Shākta Tantric beliefs, worship her
as the ultimate reality or Brahman. She is also revered as Bhavatārini (literally
"redeemer of the universe"). Comparatively recent devotional
movements largely conceive Kāli as a benevolent mother
goddess.[1] Kālī is represented as the consort of
Lord Shiva, on whose body she is often seen standing. Shiva
lies in the path of Kali, whose foot on Shiva subdues her
anger.
Kālī is the feminine
form of kālam ("black, dark coloured").[3] Kāla primarily
means "time" but also means "black" in honor of being the
first creation before light itself. Kālī means "the black
one" and refers to her being the entity of "time" or "beyond
time." Kāli is strongly associated with Shiva, and Shaivas derive
the masculine Kāla (an epithet of Shiva) to come from her
feminine name. A nineteenth-century Sanskrit dictionary, the
Shabdakalpadrum, states:
कालः
शिवः।
तस्य
पत्नीति -
काली
। kālaḥśivaḥ
। tasya patnīti
kālī
- "Shiva is Kāla,
thus, his consort is Kāli"
referring to Devi Parvathi being a manifestation of Devi
MahaKali.
Other names include Kālarātri ("black
night"), as described above, and Kālikā ("relating to
time"). Coburn notes that the name Kālī can be used as a
proper name, or as a description of color.[4]
Kāli's association with
darkness stands in contrast to her consort, Shiva, who
manifested after her in creation, and who symbolises the
rest of creation after Time is created. In his supreme
awareness of Maya, his body is covered by the white ashes of
the cremation ground (Sanskrit: śmaśāna) where he meditates,
and with which Kāli is also associated, as śmaśāna-kālī. It
is said that aspirants who wish to offer Bhakthi should
approach under the proper guidance of a Siddha or
equivalent. Chanting her mantras from anywhere would cause
unknown effect.[109]
Fig. 12. Kali, the angry and bloodthirsty goddess.
Here, we learn that Kali
has a definite connection with Shiva/Marduk and that she is the
goddess of death and time, and her personality includes a good
portion of anger and rage, which can only be stilled if she
symbolically puts her foot on Shiva’s body.
Moreover, compare the above
quote with the one below, and we start seeing a certain motif.
Quote 55: Additionally,
the myth may be described as a union of Inanna with her own
"dark side", her twin sister-self, Ereshkigal, as when she
ascends it is with Ereshkigal's powers, while Inanna is in
the underworld it is Ereshkigal who apparently takes on
fertility powers, and the poem ends with a line in praise,
not of Inanna, but of Ereshkigal. It is in many ways a
praise-poem dedicated to the more negative aspects of
Inanna's domain, symbolic of an acceptance of the necessity
of death to the continuance of life. It is in many ways a
praise-poem dedicated to the more negative aspects of
Inanna's domain, symbolic of an acceptance of the necessity
of death to the continuance of life.[110]
Inanna’s dark side is often
referred to as Ishtar, but who took over Innana’s/Isis’ role
after she had descended to the Underworld? It was Ereškigal!
Thereby, the praise was of her, not Inanna.
As we know, Shiva is the
Sun god, equivalent to Marduk in Enűma Eliš, the Babylonian
Creation Myth. Shiva is Kali’s male counterpart, also called
Kala. This proves that Shiva and Kali were consorts, just as
Marduk and Ereškigal became consorts in the Sumerian texts. We
know that Kali most certainly is not Inanna because her
attributes do not equate to those of Inanna, but on the other
hand, they do equate to those of Ereškigal. Thereby, we have a
clue already as to whom Kali might be.
Earlier in this paper, we
discussed Aditi as being one of the Vedic counterparts of Mother
Goddess. At one time, Aditi’s character must have been hijacked,
and now it becomes quite obvious that it was done by Kali, who,
at first, was presented as a benevolent figure, and she was even
mentioned as being Divine. I am primarily thinking about this
reference: “Various Shakta Hindu cosmologies, as well as Shākta Tantric beliefs,
worship her as the ultimate reality or Brahman,” from
Quote #54 above. It sound as
if, at one time, Kali was another name for the real Mother
Goddess, but with time, after the potential hijack was done,
about 500,000 years ago, her character descended into darkness,
and instead of being the Goddess of the Heavens, as Aditi was,
she became the goddess of the Underworld. This is indeed a big
leap, but in the wrong direction. People living in those times
supposedly saw these changes as allegories with layers of
meanings, but when we, in these times, examine the mythology and
understand what it really says, it tells us a whole different
story. It becomes inevitable to look at Kali as something other
than dark, bloodthirsty, warlike, and a patroness of death—not
of life.
Speaking of warlike and
blood thirst, some readers may recall how we compared Marduk
with the Vedic god, Rudra. In a revisit, I will put the reader’s
attention on the following quote from Srimad Bhagavatam:
Quote #56: There are some
types of living entities in the form of human beings whose
living conditions and eatables are most abominable.
Generally they eat flesh and fermented blood, which is
mentioned in this verse as kshatajasavam. The leaders of
such degraded men known as Yakshas, Rakshasas, bhutas and
pisacas, are all in the mode of ignorance. They have been
placed under the control of Rudra. Rudra is the incarnation
of Lord Siva and is in charge of the mode of ignorance in
material nature. Another name of Lord Siva is Bhutanatha,
meaning "master of ghosts." Rudra was born from between
Brahma's eyes when Brahma was very angry at the four Kumaras.[111]
Thus, we have Rudra, aka
Shiva, aka Marduk, married to Ereškigal in Sumer, and Kali in
India. Studying Quote #56
above, we undeniably see Rudra being heavily involved in black
magick and being associated with ignorance, Yakshas, Rakshasas,
fairies, Jinns, Fallen Angels, fairy beings like Nagas, and much
more. All of these beings are depicted in ancient texts as
demonic and dark. At one time, Rudra and his father, Vishnu aka
En.ki, were associated with both Ursa Major and Ursa Minor—the
latter which they took over completely. However, later in time,
they became more associated with the Pleiades for a reason, and
the reason is because they were cast out—not only from Orion’s
Belt, and star systems related to the constellation of Orion,
but subsequently also from other constellations under
guardianship of the Orion Empire, such as Ursa Major. Together
with En.ki and Marduk, who basically were cast out due to their
perverted sexual behavior in combination with practicing Black
Magick, a matriarch with similar tendencies was cast out as
well. Yes, we’re talking about Ereškigal. Since then, these
three Fallen Angels have been stuck together like flies to glue,
and they constantly plotted in solitude and in unison to create
more power for themselves. Their best bet is to suck the
energetic power out of humanity—here, they have an entire planet
full of beings they can use for their hideous purposes. In
addition, they have plenty of other worlds under their control,
populated by beings they may have a similar use for. Moreover,
they have their Minions, who are not from this world, who are
also using the energy of beings they have captured, and in
summary, they are building a strong and powerful army, which
they think will be strong enough in the near future to take on
the Orion Empire.
It’s quite interesting to
see where a “change” was taking place in the sense of the AIF
taking over the role of the Goddess, and Khan En.lil. Kali,
Shiva, and Vishnu had everything to do with it. That in itself
doesn’t come as a surprise after having read these levels of
learning—the surprise is rather that no one seems to have
noticed it before. Look at this, for example:
Quote #57: In the Vedas,
Aditi (Sanskrit:
अदिति "limitless")[1] is mother of the gods (devamatar)
from whose cosmic matrix the heavenly bodies were born. As
celestial mother of every existing form and being, the
synthesis of all things, she is associated with space (akasa)
and with mystic speech (Vāc). She may be seen as a feminized
form of Brahma and associated with the primal substance (mulaprakriti)
in Vedanta. She is mentioned nearly 80 times in the Rigveda:
the verse "Daksha sprang from Aditi and Aditi from Daksha"
is seen by Theosophists as a reference to "the eternal
cyclic re-birth of the same divine Essence"[2] and divine
wisdom.[3] In contrast, the Puranas, such as the Shiva
Purana and the Bhagavata Purana, suggest that Aditi is wife
of sage Kashyap and gave birth to the Adityas such as Indra,
Surya, and also Vamana.'[112]
If we go with my hypothesis
that Aditi is Mother Goddess, she was the first to be
recognized as the Creatrix and the first to be worshipped. She
is associated with space (akasa—read aKAAsa). She is seen as the
feminized form of Brahma—the first living soul in the Universe.
Then we have Daksha showing up, seemingly competing with
her about being the One Creator. Now, the question is, who is
Daksha? It’s easy to find out: “According to Hindu legend,
Daksha is one of the sons of Lord Brahma, who, after creating
the ten Manas Putras, created Daksha, Dharma, Kamadeva and Agni
from his right thumb, chest, heart and eyebrows respectively.”[113]
Note that this reference says “Lord Brahma,” which indicates a
male. Lord Brahma can therefore be no one else but En.ki in this
circumstance. Daksha is evidently the son of Brahma/En.ki.
Although four sons are mentioned, they are just different
aspects of the same being—Marduk. Remember that Marduk was the
one, according to the legend, who defeated Mother Goddess and
blew the planet Tiamat in pieces. That was the exact point,
mythologically speaking, when the takeover happened. In reality,
Marduk had very little to do with it—it was mainly En.ki’s
work—but Marduk was the one who manipulated the records
eventually, when he was the King of Babylon. Thus, this is what
Quote 57 is all about, if we
really study it carefully—the takeover, where we went from a
feminine universe to a masculine—from matriarchy to patriarchy;
Daksha versus Aditi. From thereon, the new owners of planet
Earth—the new trinity, consisting of En.ki, Ereškigal, and
Marduk—could change things around to their own liking.
The reader may argue that
if this is the case, why do we think that any of what the
ancient scriptures say, is true? It’s a fair question, and
hypothetically, the answer could be that nothing really is
true, but I wouldn’t agree with that. We do have physical
evidence that some of the things described in the texts did
happen, and when we start connecting dots, we are likely to be
quite close to what actually occurred. Another thing to bring
into the picture is our own intuition. Do we feel that
it’s wrong, or do we feel that it’s right? This is where one’s
own judgment must come into place. The hypotheses presented in
these series of papers put together is my version of
truth because regardless of the evidence, it rings true. That
these beings existed is self-evident—I do not believe at all
that humans wrote the ancient texts. How would we explain that
they are almost identical in totally different parts of the
world? Humans supposedly didn’t have the means to travel around
the world to the extent that they must have done in order to
“make up” all these stories, and the varieties of them. Also,
what about the pyramids? People are going on about the Pyramids
of Egypt, but what about all the pyramids in other parts of the
world—parts of the world that never communicated with each
other? They had pyramids, too. How could the Bronze Age people
draw airplanes, helicopters, and other technical devices that we
recognize as modern technology, or better? The evidence goes on
and on, even if we would exclude the syncretism, which we of
course can’t do. Thereby, I believe we can establish the
validity of many, if not most, of the ancient text. I dare say
that these papers are very close to telling the real history of
Earth. Not only that—for the first time, our history is told in
one place and in a modern language, and it’s told without
metaphors, analogies, or poetic symbolism. Our history is told
in plain language the way it happened. I believe we can rest
assured that this is the case.
Now, if we return to Vedic
times, I also think it’s beyond a reasonable doubt that Kali and
Ereškigal are one and the same—their personalities fit, and in
the scriptures, they were married to the same male deity. She
was the one who turned Mother Goddess and the Divine Feminine to
something dark and horrendous. Her spirit was certainly all over
the show when the “witches” were burned at the stake in the Dark
Ages. We have a lot to “thank” Kali for—many good people have
died and got brutally murdered because of her. I wouldn’t make a
mistake about it.
We have now covered the
Goddess, Khan En.lil, and the four AIF leaders in exile. Before
I put a close to this paper, there is one additional thing I
want to cover, and it’s an important one in the Vedic stories.
It’s about a first generation of human hybrids, depicted as a
hero in the stories—his name is Arjuna. It’s a story that will
reveal to us what kind of ethics and moral codes the gods have
worked on gluing into the human minds for thousands of year, and
still do up until this very day. Please read carefully.
VIII. Arjuna, the Ultimate Hero
Arjuna is indeed the
metaphor of the “ultimate hero” as told in the Bhagavad Gita.
The central part of the Arjuna story circles around the
Kurukshetra War. This piece of the mythology is considered
very holy by the Hindus, and Arjuna is looked upon as a person
of ultimate morals and righteousness. This is quite astonishing
when we hear about what happened during the battles, where
Arjuna is portrayed as a ferocious warrior and an immense
killer. However, similar to humans in the Bible, who were forced
to murder by an angry and insane “God” called Jehovah, Arjuna
was likewise manipulated to kill against his will by another
blood-thirsty “God” named Krishna. However, once he fell for
Krishna’s manipulation, he became a merciless warrior and
slaughterer.[114]
Arjuna was a human hybrid,
born to a human mother and a lofty father—in fact, his father
was Indra, aka Marduk, so he was what we would call a “First
Generation Hybrid.” Although the Vedas are filled with different
stories, I would not have brought up the one about Arjuna if it
didn’t have some relevance to what we are discussing.
I am going to make a long
story short here, or we’ll spend another fifty pages discussing
the Arjuna story. All I really want to introduce is the sense of
morals in the story—or the lack thereof. The irony is that when
we really study it, there is not anything unusual with it—all we
need to do is to watch a Hollywood movie and we get the same
twisted sense of morals and ethics. For a movie to be good—or so
we’re told—there has to be a hero in it, who is usually treated
badly by his or her adversary (I will use “he” from here on for
simplicity). At first, the hero tries to get away from the
situation, but when he notices it doesn’t work, he starts
fighting his adversary, and an incredible war breaks out that
involves perhaps most of humanity. In the end, our hero manages
to kill his adversary, but the consequences from the conflict
are devastating. Regardless, the audience just loves their hero
and thinks he is extraordinarily brave and just. It’s all
manipulation, and before I started thinking for myself sometime
in the past, I used to be the same. Now, I can see how amazingly
easy it is to brainwash an entire population. There is hardly
anyone walking out from that theatre who doesn’t think the hero
was admirable.
In this case, the
Bhagavad Gita is as holy to the Hindus as the Bible is to
the Christians. I am not even going to explain the background to
the war here, as I consider war being an extremely poor solution
to any problem. It doesn’t matter how we twist and bend
the subject of war—the reason for it, behind the scenes, is
always that someone gains from it at the cost of the lives of
thousands of people who have to do the job so that the few can
gain. We can sit and discuss that for hours, or for days, and
even if it, on occasion, looks as if the reason for a certain
war today or in the past can be justified, we just haven’t
looked far enough behind the scenes. If we do, we’re going to
find that what I said here is correct. Instead, I’m going to
bring up the moral side of the story.
Arjuna is talked into
participating in a war because “those behind the scenes” think
that he is the one who can win the war so that certain forces
can gain from it. At first, Arjuna agrees to participating, but
then changes his mind. He starts having second thoughts about
the moral aspects of the war. However, when Arjuna refuses to
continue, Lord Krishna (En.ki’s Avatar) steps in and begins to
manipulate Arjuna and convince him how important it is for
Arjuna to use his bow and arrows to kill the enemies.[115]
After much arguing back and forth, Arjuna decides to listen to
Krishna and regains his motivation to kill.
At first, Arjuna fights
well, but after a while, it indicates that he has a very hard
time defeating one of the enemies called Bhisma. This has to do
both with Bhisma’s terrific skills and Arjuna’s reluctance to
fight. This makes Krishna very frustrated with Arjuna, and
therefore Krishna himself takes up arms against Bhisma, although
Krishna earlier had taken a vow of non-aggression (but in his
mind, it is perfectly okay—and even expected—for others to fight
for the cause). Arjuna, however, does not want history to blame
him for forcing Krishna to break his vow. He manages to talk
Krishna down and once again takes up arms against Bhisma.[116]
After some fighting, Arjuna, of course, manages to defeat and
kill Bhisma.
The battles continue, and
Arjuna now fights with full vigor and finally confirms what an
incredible warrior he is. He kills people left and right and
furiously beheads his enemies, one after the other.
Just as in most Hollywood
movies, this story (which would be a great subject for a
Hollywood movie itself) ends “well.” Thanks to Arjuna, he and
his warriors win the war. Arjuna also becomes a King!
After Krishna’s death
(which came much later), and the onset of the Kali Yuga—the Age
we are living in now and which is soon about to end—Arjuna
retires and leaves the throne to his grandson, Parikshita, who
is the only descendent of Arjuna’s who has survived the war
(will how devastating it was). Giving up all their belongings,
he and the Pandavas, whom Arjuna fought together with during the
war, make their final journey of pilgrimage to the Himalayas.[117]
Only one of the people who
joins the pilgrimage, survives the long and tiresome trip.
Arjuna is the fourth of them who falls along the way. Thereby,
the life of someone who is considered a real hero, ends.
There are no limits to the
extent that Arjuna was made into a hero. Here is a great
example:
Quote #58: The character
of Arjuna is described as one whose mind is spotless and
clean of all impurities. Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita refers
to Arjuna as Anagha, which means pure of heart or sinless.
Arjuna's nobility is manifested in his magnanimity in
victory and compassion towards adversaries. He bears all the
injustice of the Kauravas with stoicism and yet hesitates to
kill them just before the war.[118]
Thus, we can see how the
ultimate morality of mankind was shaped thousands of years ago.
This is one of the main reasons why it is so easy to pump up
young men’s testosterone and have them go to war and fight for
something they have no idea what it is. They are told to fight
for “King and Fatherland,” when indeed, they are fighting to
increase the wealth of a few already super-wealthy people beyond
belief and/or to decrease the population; instigate fear and
uncertainty in the mass consciousness; arrange a mass human
sacrifice to feed the gods, or to simply satisfy the bloodlust
of the AIF.
If the majority of mankind
would sit down and read these papers with an open mind, there
would be no more wars, and there would be no more slavery or
separation. However, we are not there yet. Unfortunately, anyone
of us could put the papers on the desk in front of the majority
of the population, and they would either not even continue after
have read the first paragraph, or they would immediately throw
them in the garbage bin and turn on the TV. Thus, we will,
unfortunately, see much more suffering before things drastically
start to change. However, perhaps a majority of the souls who
are currently incarnated on Earth today are so stuck in the
manipulative mindset that they will not change in thousands of
years. Their future will be to live as cyborgs—half human
hybrids and half machines.
Moreover, before they know
it, they will be stuck in such a body for a very long time. They
will be tempted by the AIF to gain immortality if they just
follow the path of the AIF, but what is really happening is that
the AIF are creating Artificial Intelligence, which has its own
kind of energy, and the souls that are attached to run these
beings, who no longer can be called “human,” will be stuck in
artificial bodies that cannot die, unless you utterly destroy
them. This is the kind of “immortality” the gods will give to
mankind, and in their already mind controlled state, they don’t
understand what they are getting themselves into. The only
comparison is to the Atlantean Era, when the gods tried to do
the same things. However, most of the Earth was drowned in a
Deluge before that reality became true. This time, the gods know
better, and they will not make the same mistakes twice…
Fig. 13. Arjuna
Disclaimer!
The purpose for this series of papers, as with anything and
everything I have been writing, is to express my own
conclusions, based on the research I have done. It must in no
way be considered the ultimate truth and must not be considered
anybody else’s truth until that person has thoroughly thought
these things through and decided that he or she may agree with
what I have concluded, in part or as a whole. If somebody does
not agree, it must be that person’s right to individual
thinking.
Moreover, I do not want any religion, cult, secret
society, or followers to be created out of my material. Also, I
am not a guru or a leader of any kind, and I refuse to be
treated or viewed as such. At the most, I am a student of the
unknown and the mystics who wants to teach and share my
experiences and the knowledge I think that I have gained.
[13] Yoga nidra or "yogi sleep" is a
sleep-like state which yogis report to experience during
their meditations. Yoga nidra, lucid sleeping is among
the deepest possible states of relaxation while still
maintaining full consciousness.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoga_nidra
[23] Administrator is a better word
than Ruler in this case. Ruler is more connected with
ultimate power over others, which is not the case in
Orion. She is an “Overseer,” who makes sure, as soon as
it’s possible, that members of the Empire are thriving.
[25] The Devas would loosely translate
to the Orion Royal Family, while the Igigi are the
“working class.” The Igigi may include other races than
those of the Orion Empire; Lord En.ki picked them up
from different star systems if they were (or later
became) loyal to his rebellion.
[37] Isn’t it interesting how these
beings were “called upon,” and then they appeared? Where
have we heard that before? Didn’t the Ra People in Carla
Rueckert’s TheRa Material say the same
thing? They only come when they are “called upon.” In
Level III, I made connection between Ra and En.ki’s
AIF—not without merit!
[48] Remember that I spell “avatar”
with a small “a” when I refer to the human “light-body,”
which survives body death. “Avatar with a capital “A”
refers to the Avatars of the gods—the splits of their
souls into different beings.
[76] The word gaņa is interpreted in
this metaphysical sense by Bhāskararāya in his
commentary on the gaṇeśasahasranāma.
See in particular commentary on verse 6 including names
Gaṇeśvaraḥ
and Gaṇakrīḍaḥ
in: Śāstri Khiste 1991, pp. 7–8.
[89] Past term. LPG-C was dissolved
shortly after their Chief Scientists, Dr. A.R. Bordon,
died in the summer of 2013. The group members are
allegedly still working together to continue their
research, but this time they are working “underground”
and are not a public group. I personally don’t know
anything about them, or who took over after their top
scientist died. After Dr. Bordon’s demise, I lost
contact with the group—they didn’t exclude me, I just
didn’t have time to find out what actually followed upon
Dr. Bordon’s death...
[90] See Wes Penre: “The First Level
of Learning, Science Paper #1: Exploring the Unum--The
Building Blocks of the Multiverse (February 16, 2011),”
Section 6, “Regions of the Unum.”
http://wespenre.com/exploring-the-unum.htm
